You are the ref.

[joel31]

I'd say play on, no goal, book all players

[furns]

1. tough shit - no goal
2. no goal - its an interfering object entering the field of play (like that effing beachball at Sunderland away a few seasons ago)
3. all players booked - massive lols ensue

[GazFish35]

1. Stiff shit. No goal. If he didn't like the divot, he shouldn't have taken the kick. Call him Harry Kewell and wave okay on.
2. Stiff shit. Its on the cross bar, not on the field. I've heard ante was scared of jetsman and that's why he rally left all those years ago. Get on the game...... One year when I was playing Westy we played away at lakes and no bugger wanted to take corner as there was a pluver nesting on top of the hill and was swooping corner takers. Ref didn't care. Play on!
3. Get your kit off with them..... Or book em all.

[Zico]

1. tough shit - no goal
2. no goal - its an interfering object entering the field of play (like that effing beachball at Sunderland away a few seasons ago)
3. all players booked - massive lols ensue

i'm with you on these decisions.

[baldrick]

1- no goal. And the referee should caution himself for making illegal marking on the field of play

2- no goal, the eagle us an outside object interfering with play (like a flare on the field)

3 - only book the goal scorer

[GazFish35]

Keith Hackett's verdict

1) If he was unhappy with the position of the ball, he should have asked to adjust it before taking the kick. He has no right to complain now. My advice to officials in these situations is always to let the player take the appropriate action to keep the ball still, to avoid such accusations. Thanks to Steven Jackson.
2) No goal. Really the goalkeeper should have been a bit braver and stood his ground, but either way this counts as interference from an outside agent. Disallow the goal and restart with a dropped ball on the goal area line that is parallel to the goal line at a point nearest to where the ball entered the goal. Make sure the eagle is coaxed to safety, and report the facts after the game. Thanks to Terence Davidson.
3) The Law is quite clear on this: "A player must be cautioned if he removes his shirt or covers his head with his shirt". Players know they will pick up a yellow card for celebrating in this way, but they still carry on doing it – clubs just do not seem to take sufficient action against players who might be suspended for a game after picking up five yellows. So what do you do here? Caution all of them: 11 yellow cards. The club will be fined for exceeding five cautions in one game, which will hopefully inspire them to take some proper disciplinary action. Toby Wood wins the shirt.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/...aul-trevillion

[GazFish35]

Next....

[pv4]

1. Penalty. The action to use the shoulder makes the arm move into an unnatural position, which is handball.
2. Yes. If a keeper is injured and requires treatment, the game does not restart until the keeper is ready. The moment the red card is given, play has stopped, and the injured outfielder has now become the keeper - so play won't restart till he's ready. Injury time will be added to make up for the "lost" time.
3. It's not against the rules to spit anywhere except directly at another player. This is probably a judgement call by the ref - if he thinks he can quickly change out the ball with minimum fuss/delay, he might choose to do so.

[WolfMan]

1. Penalty. Shoulder strike isn't the issue, intentional or not it's still handling the ball.

2. Allow the injured defender to take his place as GK post-treatment. Obviously only if the treatment is superficial and not stitches etc.

3. Verbal warning for ungentlemanly conduct, swap the ball out and continue play