View Full Version : CHAMPNESS - the next saint of griffology?
GazFish35
09-10-2017, 01:31 AM
first thing he did was push a coastie to the ground
second thing he did was score.
I like the kid
discus
Yep.. I'm definitely with you..
:wub:
Couscous
09-10-2017, 12:00 PM
You're overegging it. His goal was set up by a freak ricochet. But yes, his finish was good.
Roundball Enthusiast
09-10-2017, 02:49 PM
You're overegging it. His goal was set up by a freak ricochet. But yes, his finish was good.
Get out.
Chimpanzee for Prime Minister.
plague
09-10-2017, 02:56 PM
You're overegging it. His goal was set up by a freak ricochet. But yes, his finish was good.
Pffffft, you out here acting like everyone can play a perfect 1-2 with the opposition.
Gypo defender put him through perfect. Mind control at its best.
GazFish35
09-10-2017, 04:45 PM
You're overegging it. His goal was set up by a freak ricochet. But yes, his finish was good.
his act of shoving a coastie to ground had nothing to do with freak ricohets
Imyourhero
09-10-2017, 07:15 PM
How many years is it acceptable to offer a player on their contract???
Don't want to make the same mistake they did with Kitto
Knocks a Gypo out within 40 seconds and sets up a goal and has a ****ing blinder with assists galore and the dumb ****s released him after that and he NEVER played for us again
turbojetfireV8
09-10-2017, 07:56 PM
his first play prior to the goal he did a really nice piece of footwork, really nice to see out of the kid, will be looking forward to him coming on as an attacking sub more often (attacking sub, geez that's something I rarely got to see under previous coach :arse: )
his first play prior to the goal he did a really nice piece of footwork, really nice to see out of the kid, will be looking forward to him coming on as an attacking sub more often (attacking sub, geez that's something I rarely got to see under previous coach :arse: )
Hope he ain't an attacking sub
If he keeps it up he should be starting
turbojetfireV8
09-10-2017, 08:07 PM
he's got to start somewhere, as an attacking sub when the opposition defence is on the backfoot is a good start as far as I am concerned
GazFish35
09-10-2017, 08:09 PM
An attacking sub?
A sub who should be starting?
We are through the looking glass here people!
StannyCFCJET
09-10-2017, 08:22 PM
Hope he ain't an attacking sub
If he keeps it up he should be starting
If our current attacking 4 ever get out of form thats not a bad replacement
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.