Printable View
Griff V VictreeQuote:
Originally Posted by plague
Korean V WSW
For Pens
We have though scored a few from set pieces. Free Kicks pumped into box etc. Not necessarily first touch but between delivery and adequately cleared by defence.
Jaliens V Victree
Neville V Pissants
spring to mind
Sure there are others
Don't recall any Free Kicks where the opposition keeper has had a BK at it
Yeah this is what I was getting at.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Surely our % of goals scored from actual build up and sockah stuff like passing and movement would have to frighteningly low.
I'm just too lazy to go back through it all.
http://www.a-league.com.au/ladder
Well Stubbins now has his wish that we can move forward because we sure as hell can't go any further back
The standout was the cheeky flick from Flores against WSW after a beautiful ball from Carney that found him in the box.....exquisite first touch and the second is a back heel into the net. Could watch that goal over and over and then in the goal celebration Flores calls the whole team over to embrace and celebrate in the corner. Shits me when people say we didn't have the quality this season.....this goal is quality created from nothing by two exceptional footballers who know how to create goals but were shafted.....fark I feel ripped off:angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
Quote:
Originally Posted by stopper2
Mr 1 in 20 clearly did not like being surounded by people who knew the game better than him and his shortcomings as a head coach.
Just realised the guy is a genius. He's a massive advocate for pro/rel and he is just demonstrating how flawed the system is without pro/rel because doesn't matter how bad you are, there are no repercussions.
imagine if he nailed that volley instead of it hitting the bar, easily goal of da yearzQuote:
Originally Posted by stopper2
Who's this Flores bloke yer banging on about?
Goals I can remember from open play:
- Flores v WSW setup by Carney
- Montano header v City or Victory? Crossed in by Griff
- Carney deflected volley vs CCM at home (EDIT: lol, could be wrong!)
- Pavicevic vs WSW
Goals scored this season:
1. Montano v Melb City (A) 1-1
2. Griff v Nix (A) 1-4
3. Neumann v Glory (A) 1-2
4. Jaliens v Victory (H) 2-2
5. Griff pen as above - penalty
6. Flores v WSW (A) 1-1 - open play
7. Montano v CCM (H) 1-1
8. Griff v Nix (H) 1-3
9. Neville v ADL (H) 2-1 - set peice
10. Neumann as above - open play
11. Montano v MC (H) 2-5
12. Neumann as above
13. Pavicevic v BRI (H) 1-2 - open play
14. Ki-Je pen v WSW (H) 1-1 - penalty
15. Bonevacia oggie v Nix (A) 2-2 Set piece
16. Neville as above - set peice
Comment away those who can remember
As promised:
Pre-sackings we had 8 points from 15 matches = 0.53 points per match. 0.8 goals per match scored, 2.3 conceded.
Post sackings we have 3 points from 5 matches = 0.6 points per match. 0.8 scored per match, 1.2 conceded.
Obviously if we lose this weekend it will be worse.
So, we aren't scoring anymore goals, have started conceding less but essentially its business as usual and nothing has changed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
Moving Forward?????
Well we've conceeded less. That's something, isn't it?
Thought #4 was from a set piece ball went through everyone he hit it at the back stick?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
Anyone????
I agree. Though that's as far as I'll acknowledge itQuote:
Originally Posted by Thomas477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
1 and 2 were headers from open play
In some media circles (won't mention names!) there is some bullshit myth being perpetuated that our squad lacked quality at the beginning of the season and were always going to struggle. I beg to differ and as an example here is exhibit #1....that Flores goal that I mentioned above. The highest of quality in both the delivery from Carney and the execution from Flores.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaWjjek4Kvo
There was also a game where Griff scored (maybe vs Nix?) where he started the game out on the right wing then after some subs, moved into the middle and scored a goal before giving the bench the big ones in what clearly looked like a "see what I can do when you play me in the position I am good at, you ****s?"Quote:
Originally Posted by stopper2
Also entirely possible that was last year. All these years of shit football are now one big collective memory.
nah, it was this season.
Yeah I'm sure the Griff one was this year.
R.I.P Griff
Wellington away, the only thing we had to cheer about between the wind and rain lol
Have we scored?
I'm honestly beginning to fear for the future of our club if Stubbins is around next season.
If we don't get a new coach in and give him the opportunity to bring in his players and have a full preseason it's another season down the drain.
It'll be three or four years before we recover from this, unless this muppet goes NOW
The bloke must go.
This has gone well passed the point of no return. His position must surely soon become untenable.
I'm in Singapore next week but am a tad worried about its laws. If I spit on Tinks, will I be fined for littering?
Surely #str8shoota Murph will finally shoot straight and bin this mug..... unless he's just another Tinks yes manQuote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
Kew scores, Griff scores, Zad scores, Goodwin scores
He must only be surviving because no one else has the tickets. Who else is qualified?
Post match interview "we got to identify where we need to strengthen"... That would be in the forwards , scoring, the midfield , defence, the coach, the owner,... Pretty much everything. Just roll out this same interview for the remaining games, says the same dribble each week anyway "we were the second best team on the park" etc. **** off Stubbins, **** off Tinkler
Someone is benefitting from the team not winning. That's why he is staying.Quote:
Originally Posted by GazFish35
He's had 21 games to determine where we need to strengthen.
From the looks of the decisions he makes, stubbins has determined we need to strengthen in the cooking utensil department.Quote:
Originally Posted by GazFish35
:rof:Quote:
Originally Posted by Pico
Bridgey will be finished his A soon:sup:Quote:
Originally Posted by GazFish35
There starts to be a case for a business decision to be made based on potential income v cost of sacking the coach.
It's been the general belief on here previously, prior to the sacking, that we wouldn't sack Stubbins because we didn't have the cash to do so. I think the amount to pay out his contract (PO) needs to be weighed up against the potential loss of income from disgruntled season ticket holders (TH). If the TH income is > PO of stubbins + potential cost of replacement, then sack stubbins!
This is possibly making more sense why Zane was sacked, because he actually has his coaching badges and is a potential internal threat to Stubbins coaching position.
Out of interest, has Zane's termination been completed?
Bridges is no great loss from the club. Plus it would be a good idea to have a coach finally with the right connexions not the wrong connexionsQuote:
Originally Posted by My2BobsWorth
You are spot on and I guess in any normal organisation this would be what they would be weighing up, but as we all know with Tinks in charge....this is not a normal organisation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
I thought he had the "right" connexions? LOL:rof:Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS