Here we Goooo!
Was trying to look at Socceroos news and came across the headlines....
“Pick Cahill or Pay the price”
“Why Cahill is key to beating Peru”
“Bert must pick Cahill”
Printable View
Here we Goooo!
Was trying to look at Socceroos news and came across the headlines....
“Pick Cahill or Pay the price”
“Why Cahill is key to beating Peru”
“Bert must pick Cahill”
Now they have the video on their pages saying this is the type of skill we need to beat Peru. We will rename the Nutmeg the Cahill.
MFKS, i don't give you a lot of credit but that is probably the most sensible thing you have said in a long time.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Formations are completely adaptable due to the circumstance. Football is not playing with a formation set on a piece of paper.
Your summary of Rogic and Nabbout are also perfect!
Now get back to your normal delusional state please. I don't like agreeing with you, its much more fun the other way!
i have a terrible feeling that we are going to win 1-0, denmark lose 1-0 and we miss out either because of a silly leckie yellow or even worse on the drawing of lots.
early knockoff today at work (2:30pm) to get to the pub and watch the game
If Bert sits him the whole game then its settled that cahill is only there as part of Berts contract as mandated by the Double-Eff-Aye.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung
At which point i will love Bert with all my heart for ever and ever.
With those results, wouldn't we get through having scored more goals?Quote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
SorryQuote:
Originally Posted by leftrightout
do they? second week into the world cup, brain is starting to let me down from lack of sleep.Quote:
Originally Posted by halo se7en
Moot point....Denmark won't lose.
The pain....the pain...
I less worried about thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Jetmaster
I think France will towel them by 2 to 3 goals
I think Australia will struggle to beat Peru though
To be honest Peru have been pretty unlucky v Denmark and France
yewww finished work for the day... now off to the pub / live site for the game at 4pm
Same starting line up except Nabbout replaced by Donkey Juric up front
****ing joke really
Juric wouldn't break in to a sweat to save himself, We are doomed.
Yeah we're f***ed
not confident.
and foster is a nob. jesus, invoking the spirit of ned kelly. :wanker:
The idea that Arzani will get a chance, while Dimi will sit on the bench kinda hurts...
plague will be happy, bash and moorey back in commentary.
30 degrees, 70% humidity. glad i'm not playing!
Doesn't Cahill have a commercial partnership with News Ltd via his Foxtel deal?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung
That may go some way explaining why every News ltd paper today had a front page dedicated to him.
peru have a great kit. would look great in blue with a gold sash.
and that's it, we're out
what a finish.
Great hit.
Geez I'd love to know how many times Jedinak touches the ball in attack. Bloke never gets space, is never open, never presents for the ball.
Just stands there all ****ing useless and shit.
Also, I dont want to get too excited, but Leckie looks like hes warming up to some peak Leckie tonight.
What a farewell gift it would be to all the travelling fans.
rogic all over. fantastic control, shoots straight at the keeper.
Ignores open man........Quote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
Same old, same old....no quality in the final third.
and there we saw it, Kruse's good thing for the tournament, wasted by Leckie
So a game with this much time in midfield and we have Gypo Jedinak and Mooy taking 4000 touches and we keep the slow tempo going
Hook them both FFS
Rather watch trash boy
To be fair..... I wouldn't pass to Juric eitherQuote:
Originally Posted by plague
why do they keep banging on about offside? the last touch is off sainsbury - doesn't that make him onside?
and it is laughable thinking that cahill, who has played something like 15 minutes in 15 matches, is up for a long stint.
I gave up trying to understand the offside rule. Once upon a time he was offside whether Sainsbury touches it or not. From my experiences from playing 3rd grade Mackay football this year, they seem to agree with the ruling on which you have said and Sainsbury touching it plays him back onside.Quote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
But I don't know. I think it should be offside but I'm not 100% sure on the wording so whatever. I assume VAR checked it over and VAR is perfect and doesn't make mistakes, ever, so it must be right.
He was offside for the initial ballQuote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
So he should have been flagged when the ball was played forward towards him
Thst Gypo touched the ball is only because he was there
So not passive offside
Neither here nor there the decision
We dont deserve to be winning this game
Kruse Mooy Rogic Juric Leckie Jedinak
These guys are frauds at this level
I thought Rogic played pretty well in the first half. We need a spark or two though. The ball clearly doesn’t want to go in.
might as well go to bed now.
And we’re done.
Another unlucky deflection... but also a lesson in football:
Australia: 7837465 passes completed - 0 goals
Peru: 3 passes completed - 2 goals