Printable View
Hazard is as good as anyone of them bar in terms of quality of play bar Messi and Ronaldo when on song. Maybe you should watch him play more. Doesnt matter who the opposition is. If your hot your hot and Man City Liverpool Man United Spurs Arsenal are all good teams and Hazard has destroyed all of them in several gamesQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
You keep telling yourself thatQuote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
The EPL isnt that good in the grand scheme of things
Neither is Hazard
Both are second rate to La Liga
Hahaha. Id like To see Barce or Madrid cope with a season where you cannot rest players before UCL games and if your not at your best you will lose to teams in the bottom half of the tableQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Football is a business.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
EPL revenues are 86% greater than La Liga's. [https://www2.deloitte.com/content/da...ance-2018.PDF]
Only a leftist would rate La Liga as a superior league.
Last 5 UCL titlesQuote:
Originally Posted by The Dunster
And 8 in the last 15 years
4 out of the last 5 Europa League titles
And 9 in the last 15 years
Yeah
Keeping telling me the EPL is a better comp
Yeah because they can rest players for their europe games. Cant do that in the premQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
HeyQuote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
Every EPL side of note has a team full of internationals on the bench or stands each game
So explain to me why they cant manage their squads again??
If you dont understand it by now then you never willQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
England look completely in control here
so this is either going to go very well for them and they'll continue to improve or they're going to royally **** it right up and we all laugh quite a lot and say it was inevitable
Looked offside but managed to get a penalty from it anyway. Quality refereeing.
England flatteted by the score here. But no doubt fans will get ahead of themselves about teams chances once to get a massive reality check when they face a quality opponent.
Coach will cop the blame. Rinse and repeat.
ok so England's third goal was actually pretty damned good
time for the media to get carried away
Good buildup and brilliant finish. Comparisons to 66 team can't be far away.Quote:
Originally Posted by boz-monaut
Stones offside a mile for the 4th goal. How can anyone that close to goal be considered passive?
Then again the 2nd goal was awarded to an offside player and for a foul after england player handball.
Surely the bookies are running this game.
That’s how you plan a free kick
this is only going to make it hurt so much more when they go out on penalties this time
Learn the offside rule properlyQuote:
Originally Posted by The Dunster
I know the rule. It's ridiculous to call anyone passive from such a position.Quote:
Originally Posted by Premy
I understand it's a different phase of play making the goal legit. But it's a ridiculous rule.
About time the wrestling in the box got pinged. That was ludicrous from the Panama defenders.
It aint like their opponemt is much chop
Like really
No offence
But Panama are pretty ****ing bad
Panama only scored 9 goals in the qualifiers. They must have been penalties based on how honking they look in front of goal.