My BadQuote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
Printable View
My BadQuote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
Garbage nope no way, but hey apparently Clubs are suppsoed to have no ambition and outside help and just let Manchester United win everything year after year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Premy
All gQuote:
Originally Posted by cobra23
Typical.....football only started when the premier league kicked off.Quote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
you sure, arsenal one of the most tight clubs re spending big.Quote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
"Garbage nope no way"Quote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
Great rebuttal, go stick your head in the sand some more.
What did Chelsea win before Bates came along? 1 title in like 80 years, didn't he buy Chelsea for 1 quid? Your club was a basket case and always needed the help of someone's cash.
Tell me where I said club's should have no ambition? Ambition is fantastic if they had ambition they would have strove to build it themselves.
Chelsea is famous for 2 things a Flower Show and Plastic Flags now run back to your own thread and talk about the cockney shite there.
Hey, we have the Fourth biggest Wage bill in the PL. Plus we just signed a 20 yr old left back for 40,000 quid. We know how to throw money around...Quote:
Originally Posted by goaliepersempre
:lulzturtle:Quote:
Originally Posted by Premy
any other time you take a point from manure is normally not a bad point,
BUT, the point this morning i think has ended our title shot for the year :angry::closed:
Hahaha dammit Hawk
:shock: what the **** did klopp give us for xmas.
to much pudding
Is Mane playing on Wednesday heard you guys were flying him back pronto???????
They are flying him back ASAP. Whether or not he plays will be purely on how he feels imo.
If he is good to go, he will start.
If he's feeling okay, but a bit jaded, he will probably get 30 minutes or start and go off at 60.
Obviously if he is no good, we won't rest him.
This is exactly the game we will win. Playing like balls against absolutely rubbish teams and being made look terrible. Come up against an in form all but champion team in Chelsea.
Gotta admit I'm a little concerned Liverpool have become a boogey team atm. Im banking on Chelsea continuing to not lose to teams outside the top 6 to carry us to the title.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung
:rof::rof:Quote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
Think Arsenal are the only danger to chelks title now
if we lose to Liverpool and Arsenal you might have a chance. But I dont consider arsenal a threat while Wenger is in charge. Ive had this view for almost 8 years and not changing now.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk
Maybe on PS4
The game is 7am on a Wednesday what holy hell is this, Be late to work or watch it when i get home and risk already knowing the result ffs
You look unwell.Quote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
I have been feeling a bit off lately hahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung
Because stats prove everything here's a stat that proves everything.
In the 13 years since Roman took over, Chelsea have got 161 more EPL points than Liverpool.
In the 13 years before he took over Liverpool scored 94 more EPL points than Chelsea.
See, stats.
Close thread.
Is this another way of saying Chelsea bought success??Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
No it's a stat that proves stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
Once you have a stat there is no need for nuance.
It's right there in your face.
It was Blackburn Rovers under Jack WALKER who ****ed everythingQuote:
Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET
He bought the EPL
He led to the blue print Abramovich and the Arabs at Man City have followed
Knock arsenal and Man Utd all you want
Their success has been down to their hard work and consistent good work
Unlike Man city who bought everything they have had
Unlike Chelsea who have bought everything they had
Go have a look at Chelsea at the formation of the EPL they were a no name mid to lower table shit club doing nothing just like West Ham
Chelsea won 1 league title and a FA Cup in nearly 100 years then they bought everything
So all the players from arsenals invincible season were youth products were they?Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
When they were kids Henry and Bergkamp used to climb that big oak tree on the hill at Highbury to peep over the fence at their idols.
An interesting thing I've found.
Chelsea First Team squad players: 25
Out On Loan players: 36
Arsenal Squad: 29
Out on Loan: 6
Man Utd squad: 26
Out on Loan: 6
Man City Squad: 26
Out on Loan: 18
Liverpool squad: 30
Out on Loan: 11
Spurs squad : 24
Out on Loan: 3
Barca: 24 and 12 on loan
Real Madrid: 24 and 7 on loan
Bayern: 24 and 3 out on loan
Don't know what it means, if it means anything, i just found it interesting Chelsea have so many players on their books.
We use it as a profit system but Now with Conte our youngsters actually get a chance in the first teamQuote:
Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung
I was just surprised, like I'm not saying it's a bad thing, good on them for finding ways to make money. They are also players their rivals can't sign.
never accept that deluded fiction. manu bought the comp for years. They also had the best manager so didnt have to pay quite as much.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Sounds like sour grapesQuote:
Originally Posted by hawk
My point is Man u and Arsenal were winning their titles on the back of being big well run clubs
Spuds Liverpool are both big clubs but we're not run so well hence the lack of titles
Blackburn Chelsea Man City bought their position at the top of the game
Leicester some how arsed it in something that defies logic
Is this the same Man utd that a few years back were looking to sell their home ground to raise funds to stay afloat?? The same man utd that were bailed out by the yanks??? Yep they were really well run.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
That is a ridiculous point. roflQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Chelsea are a well run club and they spent what they had to to win the league as every club has cept Lesta. Manu used to spend the most but retained players avoiding repeated costs. And for a little while now they have finally been out spent and are not winning titles. Man city have spent a lot but dont quite have the squad this season. Arse spent just alittle under the sh1tload that others have. A billion today is similar to a few mill in the 80's, dont get confused now.
Sour grapes? Your havin a larf.. Anyone here who puts their emotion on the line in epl is in for a rough time. wine is for bums.
Chelsea may well now be a well run club
They may well have been a well run club as they grew from the 80k 90s when they were crap
But don't try dressing up the reality that they achieved success based on spending excessive levels of cash to bridge the gap and achieve success
Excessive levels of cash that could have turned Brentford Charlton Millwall into EPL elite
Tough game a draw possibly fair result. Costa you mung you gotta berry those penalties lad.
Only saw the second half, and thought Liverpool looked pretty good. Unlucky not to score 2.
Bit then chelseas misssd penalty.
Costa has that damn Suarez ability to infuriate the opposition with his little tricks and tactics, looking for contact and going down. If he's on your team aka Suarez, you love him. If not, you hate him.
By all accounts Chelsea looked better in the first half, so draw probably fair, both teams could've won.
Liverpool were all over us with possession and the high pressing and the fact that chelsea couldnt keep the ball, But for all their possession they did nothing with it and their only well worked attack pretty much and they scored.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung
We did nothing either so draw is fair
kante was immense too btw.
And Moses has certainly improved since his loan at Liverpool.
As someone said attack is more important than defence :blush::lol::blush:. there's always next century
:soapbox: