Don't think miller would
Printable View
Don't think miller would
Think it could go two ways. Tits up real quick or he takes him under his wing as his problem child and drops some of that superb scotty M vocabulary on him.
I would take him in a heart beat. The bloke is a grade A wanker.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilso8948
If he played for us he would be our wanker and would win the fans over in no time with his never quit attitude
1.
2. Daniel Mullen - 16/17
3. Jason Hoffman - 17/18
4. Nigel Boogaard - 17/18
5. Ben Kantarovski - 16/17
6.
7.
8. Mateo Poljak - 16/17
9.
10.
11. Labinot Halti - 16/17
12. Andy Brennan - 16/17
13.
14. Mitch Cooper - 16/17
15.
16. Steven Ugarković - 16/17
17. Radan Pavicevic - 16/17
18.
19. Morten Nordstrand - 16/17
20. Ben Kennedy - 16/17
21.
22. Lachlan Jackson - 16/17
23.
Nick Cowburn - 17/18
Devante Clut - 17/18
Wayne Brown - 17/18
Daniel Alessi - 17/18
Andrew Hoole - 16/17
Jack Duncan - 17/18
Ivan Vujica -17/18
1 more u/20 + 2 others (ST and another winger)
we need two wingers off starting class and another striker as good as or better then nordstrand IMOQuote:
Originally Posted by The Postman
Joice u20 and two foreign wingers?
Yeah Joice would be one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimario
1 foreign outright winger
1 foreign winger/striker.
If we get rid of Cooper then we'd have another spot open. We had an extra 90k from Carney on top of the cap, can't we use this to pay someone out?
Contract terminations are no longer counted in the cap. I remember reading that as a change last year.Quote:
Originally Posted by lil_masi
Turkish Matt Simon. Limited ability, but plenty of workrate.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
I find I disagree with basically all your opinionsQuote:
Originally Posted by RAM
I'm all for Bulut.... He only wants to play Striker and we need one
He'll bring "passion" and "emotion" to the club and we also need more of that
So explain to me how Brennan Pavicevic and BK haven't been released yet??Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
I can try and assume. The club see value in the player and want to retain them, they haven't been approached by a team wanting to sign them and hence the conversation hasn't occurred or the Jets want rid but the player wants to stay, hence the termination isn't mutual (this word is probably missing from my original post).Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
100%.Face tats rock.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilso8948
Here is another rationale, we have not had the money for these payouts. Just because the payout isn't included in the cap does not mean that we have the cash to do this. Under FFA control we ran to a tight player budget which ruled out using any salary cap concessions. So paying out players obviously was not an option.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
Ledman has opened the purse strings a little but we still run under a player budget. Yes we could pay out these players but what exactly would that achieve. Both Pav and Brennan would be min wage, so assuming we are spending up to the cap limit this year (addition of Hoole and Duncan would indicate that) could only be replaced by min wage players. Plus the payout itself eats into our player budget meaning less can be spent overall.
I would however like to see one or both of the remaining Visa players be signed as marquees, in name only, so that should players, such as Brennan, leave mid season on their own accord we have some flexibility under the cap.
Having looked at this and tried to find some information, I don't necessarily believe this is accurate. I remember the FFA brought some flexibility to the system, something like a contract termination payment (i.e. payout of a contract) could be spread out over the following 2 years or that it could be brought forward to the current salary cap year (i.e. next years salary included in this years etc). I could be wrong and happy to be corrected, but if it were the case then SFC would have cut half their contracted players this year (particularly Smeltz).Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
I just did too. I found clauses in the FFA Registration Regulations, but nothing on the salary cap.Quote:
Originally Posted by borat
Hmmm
Find a club willing to take on someone not good enough for our squad AND willing to pay them similar cash, or more????
Find replacements who would improve the squad, and be willing to sign on similar wages to the lesser players we are moving on????
Pav and Brennan would know where they stand, and that they're on a good thing at the moment.
So too with BK, but not because of his ability, if his wage rumours are true it's simply because he's being paid overs. I think he'd get a gig elsewhere, but not on the money he's apparently on..... That and I reckon they see him as a legitimate starting option this season.
It's not poor management of the current administration. It's still a hangover from poor management decisions made previously.
Sounds like a good question for our coach or CEO :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
I must be doing something right.Quote:
Originally Posted by pv4