WSW have released a statement saying that they've banned 14 ppl from the RBB for 18 months, and rest of them are on notice to pull their heads in or risk their active area being shut down. About bloody time.
Printable View
WSW have released a statement saying that they've banned 14 ppl from the RBB for 18 months, and rest of them are on notice to pull their heads in or risk their active area being shut down. About bloody time.
:lulzturtle:Quote:
The Club also provides notice that should there be any further breach of the Spectator Code of Behaviour in the Active Supporter area or on any RBB official social media platform that active area will be shut down for a period of time as determined by the Club.
Haha, it will only be 14 alias' they use to get extra Centrelink benefits.Quote:
Originally Posted by furns
Besides, Graham Arnold doesnt even have a blue face.
Storm in a teacup etc etc.
Other wsw douches wondering why the rrb isnt kid friendly. fkn biggest retards.Quote:
Originally Posted by q-money
kudos to some random bloke on 442 foz nicknaming the whole affair "Blowghazi"
:roflz:
Just as an aside, but something that needs to be very carefully looked at, is the way some of these headlines are worded.
emphasis mine.Quote:
The president of Australia's first gay soccer club, Sydney Rangers FC, has called for one-year bans for all fans involved in the display of an anti-gay banner during the Sydney Derby.
but 'anti-gay'?
because somehow the debate quickly shifts to whether this is 'anti-gay' or 'hate speak' rather than focusing on the idiots that did it.
Depends on your POV, as a hetero white bloke I would call it homophobic/derogatory. I wouldn't see that as specifically anti-gay.
Not being gay myself however, I couldn't and wouldn't assume how anyone in the LGBTQI community felt about it.
Homophobic? how? Put long hair in the pic and thered be another group up in arms.
but id be more focused on the anti family sentiment unless you like your kids to see that stuff, which noone else in here seems to mind.
yeah see for mine this is the real target.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk
it was just plain rude, derogatory and unacceptable.
but not 'anti' anything.
I see the banner as meaning that Graham Arnold is a cocksucker, with the undertone of implying homosexuality in a negative way (which of course is wrong in this case, because he's just a total khunt, which has asshole undertones without the homosexuality aspect). I can't speak for the QWERTY community or whatever the acronym is, but I doubt they consider randoms calling them cocksuckers in public to be a compliment...
The fact that it would be considered sexist if it was depicting a woman actually shows it was homophobic for mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk
Like turbo said, telling someone to suck a dick is an insult born from homophobia/sexism that insinuates people who do that are bad/lesser than us straight men.
the only thing better than outrage culture is the outrage shown by blokes that get offended by people being outraged by things
how fkn stupid is the modern world
valid point.Quote:
Originally Posted by turbojetfireV8
never looked at it that way.
Cheers,
Plague.
yeah but the TV's are huge now and flights to cool places overseas are pretty cheap all things considered.Quote:
Originally Posted by q-money
this lyfe aint all bad.
Geez, hope we don't put up any "G**o" banners this weekend.
We haven't come too far though. Throughout most houses at Cambridge University between 1890-1950's economics was called the gay science simply because an overwhelming majority of the academics participated in same sex relations. On the other hand though, these same people were very influential with respect to public policy / government and would never have condoned same sex relations between anyone in the general public. In fact, the many of these academics even had wives.
It all goes back to the divide and conquer strategies of many religions and not only has it captured religious types it seems to have grabbed a few atheists and agnostics as well.
In my family I have several gay members and none of them or their partners would be offended by the poster, and none of them think gay marriage should be a priority given other aspects of society require far more urgent attention.
Hence, when people automatically assume that a few loud individuals speak for the entire group most times you are going to be missing the truth by a fair margin.
As Plague alluded to....the banner doesn't need validation from any group.
It was just "offensive"....would have been the same if there was a big hand giving "Arnie" the finger.
Agreed. It's in the best interests of the game to keep it family friendly. THe last thing the game needs is parents refusing to bring children to games because of the actions of a few idiots.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetmaster
Go suck a dickQuote:
Originally Posted by parksey
We got a moron here
http://www.a-league.com.au/article/w...6129p941il2xtf
WSW immune from real sanctions much?
https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/...6/55613686.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by turbojetfireV8
Referring to the FFA obviously, not you turbo haha
They've set a precedent here that would be challenged by any club who have points docked over fan behaviour.Quote:
Originally Posted by furns
Weak as this apology for an article endorsing it?
http://www.theherald.com.au/story/44...oints/?cs=2439
Not offensive :rof:Quote:
Originally Posted by parksey
"brutally rapes small, cute dogs"
Could be wrong, but pretty sure parksey didn't choose that himself..Quote:
Originally Posted by RAM
Probably wrong.. :gent:
:rof:
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbojetfireV8
yeah but im pretty sure the FFA made it very lear that if this happens again they will get very very cross and some nasty things will happen.
maybe.
but serious though, next time they are in big big trouble.
Wellington have stood down Ryan Lowry, Tom Doyle and, most interestingly, Roly Bonevacia.
I'm unsure the position we had Petratos down to play, but if we could go after someone like Roly, particularly if he is unsettled, it could be massive. He's fantastic.
Still not even. It is an insult and its up to each person to find their angle to be offended.Quote:
Originally Posted by parksey
:rof::rof:Quote:
Originally Posted by RAM
So yesterday now. Surely smurfs will have to beat it
http://pmd.foxsports.com.au/free/nog...31911_1596.mp4
ah, is this the standard for everyone, or just WSW? :popcorn:
Bonevacia would be outstandingQuote:
Originally Posted by Jeterpool
straightup. get it doneQuote:
Originally Posted by Wilso8948
They just said that Wellington may have 12 players out for the game against the jets due to international commitments. 11 kiwis and 1 for Fiji.
Imagine the scenes when we get rolled by wellingtons youth.... do Wellington have a youth team?
Because it's only against us, watch the ffa reschedule to help them out. If it was Sydney or both melbournes they'd leave them to the slaughterQuote:
Originally Posted by weston
He's a Visa player - do we have room or do we need to also move someone on ?Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk
Let's move someone on.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dunster
Nobby is a decent forward will good skills but gets out muscled all too often on the ground and in air. Kokko hasnt been on enough to be regarded as a player yet. harsh but true
Couldn't be done till the off-season
Marinkovic and Kalfalah are another two visas I would look at. Struggling for consistent game time in strong squads but show what they could do when they do start
Not a bad shout. I think our big money should be spent on a striker and a centre midfielder. The 2 you've mentioned would fit in that lower wage bracket and are a known quality to fit the remaining visa spot. All depends on how many Chinese are forced into the squad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilso8948