New thread for Nathan Coe and FK's
Printable View
New thread for Nathan Coe and FK's
That's a generous call giving BK all the creditQuote:
Originally Posted by GazFish35
FFS They are Gypos
Everything is beyond their skill set
The bloke last week was kiwi who's eyes are abnormally close together in his head, but bk still was afforded all the blame by some.
Just applying the same logic. ;)
That's actually quite offensive to compare Kiwi's and Gypo's of being of similar calibre. Kiwi's don't deserve to be ridiculed like that. They are a thousand times better than Gypo'sQuote:
Originally Posted by GazFish35
:(Quote:
Originally Posted by q-money
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...qhyzafeo0v.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by hawk
Bump
****ing shit **** didn't even dive.
Best thread
This should distract from the plastic fan debate
We won - who gives a shit?
But but but........Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetmaster
Exactly, a win over a massively understrength wanderers should be enough to paper over all the cracks that were apparent. God knows Adelaide will be trembling in their boots next week seeing we beat the wanderers youth side 2-1!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetmaster
Honestly that was a ****ing disgraceful effort from BK.
Credit he saved our arse a few times in the first half but his effort at dealing with this free kick was ****ing poor. The second effort that hit the side netting he was exactly the same and it was more fortune than anything it didn't go in
Can we make a sub when we concede free kicks coz he has NFI
Good pick up Member.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
I thought the goal from Kelmar was the same as the others. obvs the plan was for BK to take the open side as usual and for Hoole to protect the spot behind the wall.
I've no doubt BK was playing for the shot to go open side (from memory there was a left footer lined up to take that shot).
Good free kick, goal. BK was never getting it.
As for the other one that hit the side netting (I've only seen it once) BK looked like he got it all wrong and was lucky the shot missed. He was pretty poor on that one imo.
The haterz should be focusing on that one, not the goal, if you want to have a dig at the bloke.
On the plus side he was still by far the best keeper on the park today.
Ante wtf?
So, what you're getting at is the haterz analysis of the situation is poor. First time for everything I suppose.Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
Bk sees no sense in winning by too much. why dive when 2 up. keeps excitement levels up.
Sorta.Quote:
Originally Posted by GazFish35
Just reackon BK was poor on the other free kick that hit the side netting and he had a shocker giving up the (2nd?) goal against Heart.
I can more than agree people having a dig at those but for some reason people always go back to well taken free kicks.
Totally disagree that BK was never getting it. That was defo not a world class free kick from Kaimar.Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
BK set up issue is that he has so much faith in the wall that anything going that side he ain't dealing with at all.
Basically the free kick taker has anywhere 2-3 metres the side of the wall to score as BK isn't making any effort to get to that spot.
I understand our wall mannequin has more than likely been repossessed or flogged on eBay by now but every other club bar the Gypos would have one. I am pretty certain the opposition sides practice that exact free kick at training going over the wall into the goal. There success rate should be reasonable at training without a keeper. The way BK deals with them it is a training drill for them as the keeper ain't contributing
As for the second one Kalmar over thought the thing and backed he could have went round the wall and curled it. He wasn't far from succeeding and it was just him being a shit **** that was the issue.
It is a ****ing big issue this and the BK fanbois need to accept the bloke has big issues in this department
He is supposed to have faith in the wall. That's its job.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Obvs Stubs has been reading this thread coz he finally tried to cover the space with Hoole but in typical Jets fashion that all went to poop too.
If BK stood behind the wall then the left footer over the ball hits an easier shot into the open side.
If blokes on here can't see that then I can't do nothin for u man.
Rock up tomorrow and quit you MuppetQuote:
Originally Posted by plague
We will see how that works then
Looking forward to the reasons given why BK should have saved the second goal.
Didn't pay much attention because I was starting a Stubbins Out chant the second it went in. From memory it looked a great strike though I could be mistakenQuote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
Didn't he save a free kick last night that went over the wall?
Forza BK.
WE DONE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200901/r331745_1496920.jpg
Nothing he could have done, cracking goal.Quote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
BK, he's like a bad version of that Meatloaf song.Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
One out of six thousand and three ain't bad
Ah Con, miss the guy and his antics. :blush:
I think we'll look back in a few years time and say he was the best Owner we ever had....Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas477
He is definitely better than the current one and every other one we have had and I would go as far as saying he is the best owner we have ever had now and not wait for one day.Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfMan
We at least made the finals 4 of the 5 years he ran the club and he had a decent record in the NSL also
And even with his shenanigans, you knew he was trying his best to bring success to the club. Didn't always work, but his heart was in the right place.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Maybe a banner for the last home game "Bring back Con"?
While I agree with your sentiments, I was merely taking the pi$$ with reference to the previous rhetoric RE: Brillante
Was interesting to see that EPL level goalie get beat over the wall this morning despite a full length dive.
It's like there's no justice in this world.
As a legitimate question to the people who wanted BK in when Biraz was playing for us (and because I cbf finding the BK vs Biraz thread) - do you guys want John Solari to be given a chance next game, and for the rest of this season?
IIRC there were multiple reasons you guys wanted BK in when Biraz was conceding goals, but the ones I can vaguely remember were:
- Biraz was conceding goals, we were losing (or not winning) games
- The only thing you (we) had to judge keepers on was form, and Biraz was "clearly not in form" so why not give BK a chance to assess and compare his form to Biraz's. It was/is impossible to say how the keeper who wasn't playing would go in the same situations without seeing it first-hand.
- Training form was irrelevant and hard to judge (and too subjective), games were the only indicator we could properly assess it. So why not give him a crack?
And for those reasons I ask: does your logic now say it is time to give our reserve keeper a run of starts to assess if he would or wouldn't be a better option than BK?
This is particularly focused at GazFish, but happy for any of the guys who agreed with Gaz and co when they said the above back in the day, to give their thoughts also.
Considering Muppet has failed to really give anyone other than Cowburn a solid go from the Yoof in recent weeks then why ask??
Pavichevick Lundy and Crowley have got on the park but haven't exactly been blessed with a decent opportunity as such more so cameos
You honestly think BK is getting dropped to give the Yoof Keeper a go particularly with BK having such a good agent???
After seeing Scolari playing in the NPL, I wouldn't hold my breath.
But it does seem like BK can't be criticised. I remember that Birghitti was dropped after the roar game because his kicking was off, never mind the fact that he kept that score respectful and was our best that night. Could easily have been 7. BK should've been dropped by now, but Mr Stubborns can't admit he was wrong.
Absolutely horrendous stuff from BK last night.
I think he cops a bit more than he should, and I do like the guy a lot, but I think by this point in his career it's clear that he's not a top 'keeper and never will be.
We better not just promote solari in the offseason. If Kennedy isn't gonna be replaced by top keeper then it at least has to be someone to put immense pressure on himQuote:
Originally Posted by parksey
Agree. Last night confirmed this, he should be riding the pine next season, as we sign some sort of quality keeper. Perfect world and all that.Quote:
Originally Posted by parksey