http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/...20100316023322
life as a jerks fan :banghead:
Printable View
http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/...20100316023322
life as a jerks fan :banghead:
**** Gerry Harvey.
Apparently he gave Tinkler the money the other week to keep Tinkler in control of the Jets
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1227242825962
Tinkler must have some good photos of Harvey, only explanation I can think of to continually lend this poor excuse of a man money.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Wonder what Interest Free period he's running currently?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry Harvey
Did the players get paid this month?
http://www.theherald.com.au/story/29...spoils/?cs=305
Hopefully these people succeed in digging a few more knives in to the big man.
?Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Reddog IT chasing to have the club wound up, Ceditors chasing to recoup anything, players not paid again, rumours the FFA is paying the players this month......surely this has to end soon.
And we have Murphy in the herald (http://www.theherald.com.au/story/29...te-pay/?cs=306) says
"The club continues to work through challenging circumstances. But we’re committed to stabilising those matters in the near future. It’s quite public the challenges that we’re dealing with ... we’re working though very complex and challenging circumstances at the moment and we’re doing our best.’’
I call BS. We can't pay for a thing at the moment. Murphy has for everyones talk achieved nothing (I don't hold that against him, like middleby he has Tinkler as the crux of the problem). Nothing has changed, nothing will change until we fold or FFA step up to the plate.
Right now, our saviour looks to be Reddog IT.
Go reddog
Gerry Harvey was on Sky News tonight and had a great insight into Tinks.
Said he'd lent Tinks about $60million and through asset sales he's reduced that debt to $6 or $7 million.
theory: FFA are simply waiting till the end of the season to take over the club.
makes a lot of sense to me.
- they don't want the Jets drama overshadowing the finals (which it would if FFA resume the licence)
- they don't have to fund the club until they absolutely have to fund the club
- they get an entire off-season to tidy things up
- they off-load the club just before the start of the season when I assume a large proportion of the expenses occur (flights, accom, win bonuses, increased injuries etc)
from the FFA point of view, why would they step in now? tinks keeps finding the money somehow, yet keeps on breaching his licence (to me anyway). they would have all the evidence they need, but this way they don't pay any of the bills.
The FFAs actions v tinkler are a disgrace when compared to what they did with Con
Con wanted one grant/wages paid forward and they kicked him straight out the door at a time when the a-league was suffering because all the FFA cared about was getting the 2022 world cup
tinkler has had numerous chances and they continue to let him own the club when the game is at its absolute strongest.
the Sydney and Melbourne media are beginning to watch this story a lot more closely and its going to start tarnishing our game if they don't act soon.
late wages payments are a much better back page story than a 5-4 semi final and its moving away from the real product.
I have had this thought many times in recent months.Quote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
For every dollar they can squeeze out of Tinks til seasons end is one less dollar they need to come up with.
i originally thought they may have been using the Asian cup as a way of avoiding dealing with it, but they should have acted by now imo.
I think you will find your maybe not quite far off the mark. Whilst ever Tinks keeps pulling Rabbits out of his arse and at least appears to make the effort he is trying they ain't doing shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by belchardo
Not so certain they are waiting until end of season though.
Think they are more so expecting him to have to have to concede defeat at some point like he did with Patinack and the Knights and are more so letting nature run its course etc.
Saves them a legal stoush and other than people in Newy hating on them for not acting sooner no one cares
What if FFA want the licence for another town and Tinks wants it to stay in Newy. Newy doesn't own the licence and it could end up anywhere. Conspiracy? Be careful what you wish for.
Where is it going nostrildamus??Quote:
Originally Posted by My2BobsWorth
Canberra Wollongong??
No better options than us.
Of they want another team in Sydney or Melburn the FFA will just put one there.
Your talking shit again
Ok I'll be a little nicer than the good Member here but if there's any city ready to go within months (to keep the broadcast deal legit) then we would know about it already. Trust me.Quote:
Originally Posted by My2BobsWorth
Conversely if they think they can 'pull a Wanderers' and get a club up and running in the space of a few months then they are tripping. Wanderers invented football so that was a slam dunk.
But Im also not a conspiracy theory type dude* so you could be dead right.
*except 9/11, George Bush def pulled that off.
They can't put just one new team in, it has to be two. Newy has been a pain in the arse for FFA for longer than Tinks has been involved and the Gyps are no better, so why not join the two together. Red blue yellow. PV4 can make it work.
Did anyone else notice the part where Gallop said the FFA have had problems with debt themselves recently?
I would be taking that into consideration...
Still ****ed though.
Dear Fox,
During the finals how about getting Tarek, Rubes and Griff together with the Bozza and have an in depth interview about what has really happened in Newcastle over the last few years - would be compelling.