Look at these two cynical ****wits with the same opinion.
Printable View
Interesting question RE: Hoole's replacement.
One I don't have an answer for. I'd love to keep Hoole for the next 6 months, but it's his (and his agent's) decision to try their luck abroad.
So you've acknowledged that they are shit players but still want the club to waste two squad positions on them (and actually pay them)...
yep... you're logic is flawless... let's keep encouraging the mediocrity because we can save some funds in the cap.
As an alternative we could just, you know, recruit better players into those two squad spots.
Are you the guy in this week's David Squires Cartoon?
http://www.newcastlefootball.net/for...4&d=1488422911
http://www.newcastlefootball.net/for...5&d=1488422911
Attachment 1404Attachment 1405
https://www.theguardian.com/football...ampions-league
I can sort of see both sides of the argument however many mentions regarding this spending is outside the cap however no one has mentioned that Mr Lee would most likely have an overall squad budget to work to as well..
People do realise it is Scott Miller's new club that Hoole is looking to sign with ?
Yeah, the argument I am making is very much around WHY other clubs have much better squads. Someone like Broxham has been at MV since he started, would almost definitely be getting paid out of the loyalty amount and then the rest of his wages that would be inside the cap for chumps like us, spent on improving the rest of the squad. Throw in two marquees and suddenly the gap grows. And if we aren't going to have a back up GK and versatile mid/def as PART of that outside the cap spend (because they are the only ones who qualify for it), then they aren't even worth discussing as options, IMO.
Bring David carney home
I understand what your saying, and i agree a couple of marquees outside the cap would definitely see us better able to compete wage wise with other clubs.
I just don't agree that the marginal cap saving advantage that re-signing these two players (who should be on min wage) allows, outweighs the downside of bringing down the overall quality of the squad by encouraging these mediocre signings.
If we did get a couple of quality marquees and ALSO stopped paying overs for the players that wouldn't get a run at another club... then we're onto something.
You consider a 300k saving in the cap as marginal?
Also, you talk about BK and BK as if they are two players that are of Sam Gallagher or John Welsh standard. They are both exactly the type of players that a Melbourne or Sydney would keep around as serviceable squad depth.
I think Kantarovski has been quite reasonable this year. He started well in the first few weeks while Poljak was injured and kept him on the bench until he was forced to CB. Last weekend I thought he hit the ground running.
He's undoubtably got injury issues, which must be considered if he is re-signed - perhaps incentive contract based on appearances.
As it stands, if we want to take advantage of this exemption, Kanta and BK are the only two who fit the critera.
I think whoever said earlier that it depends on what Lee budgets outside the cap spend will be a massive influence. James Gardiner tweeted yesterday that the Jets expect to lose $2 million this year. If they have, say, $500,000 allocated will we spend it all on a marquee (leaving the cap for 22 players) or on the 2 long serving players and an NPL player (leaving the cap for 20 players). Spending it on the 3 players boosts squad depth and as Grimario has repeatedly stated allows a greater amount, on average, to be spent per player.
So is it ok to boo Hoole whenever he gets near the ball now ? I mean the seasons practically over now without much hope of being in the finals. Seems only fair we take out our frustrations out on Hoole [Benedict Arnold]
Sorry, I thought Hoole signed when Miller was coach. The Telegraph even had Miller commenting about him signing with the Jets from Sydney FC
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...0eb266f174a2d7
I'm reading sarcasm here, at least I hope so.
The 1 year deal we signed Hoole to was perfect. He flops as I guess most of us expected - no big deal. As it goes, he's started to hit his straps, albeit not with the greatest consistency, and we had hopes of extending his stay.
The bloke might be known as a bit of a silly billy sometimes, but fair play if he feels he is up for an overseas stint
If Hoole goes overseas hell get a shock of how below standard he is atm and I can see him returning to the aleague in a few years
Hoole is making the same mistake as Taggart - getting ahead of himself and going a season too early.