the uruguayan j griff
good for the game
Printable View
the uruguayan j griff
good for the game
he just wanted a taste of a champions league team
Pffffft, the usual phony outrage.
I love the 'The club HAS to sell him' line.
Why?
Terry, Ferdinand, Cantona, Defoe all pulled some pretty weak ass shit in their time and their clubs all stood by them.
Why should Suarez be any different?
Jeez, speaking of embarrassing the good name of Liverpool FC, have you seen Jamie Carragher defend?
Get over yo'selves.
Don't mention that blokes name on the foz ever again.Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
GVE will probably sign him now to take us to more comedy levels at the back
thisQuote:
Originally Posted by plague
Alas, forgot to update my post with Ashley Cole shooting a kid with an air rifle at training.
But please don't let me interrupt the public lynching of 'old bitey'.
Anyone got a stream to watch for when the residents of Mt Pius set him alight?
there's a difference between standing by a player when he does something stupid or controversial and standing by a player that does it on a regular basis and seemingly doesn't really gaf about his or the club's image and reputation.
He just wanted to take a chunk out Chelsea's champions league hopes.
On Liverpool's twitter (or one of the many accounts from Liverpool) that Suarez has been given a 10 week ban.
I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by parksey
Just like when Giggsy was tooling his sister in law innit?
Sounds fair.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zico
Now lets all move on.
looks like you missed the point, champ.Quote:
Originally Posted by plague
No I didn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by parksey
I just don't agree with yours.
There's a difference.
ok so Defoe gets nothing for his chomp in 2006 and Suarez gets 10?
About as even handed as Terry getting four games for racism and Suarez getting 8.
wd to the FA for consistency.
To be fair though there was never a 'fair' punishment in this case.Quote:
Originally Posted by furns
They obvs looked at the first offence which he got 7 for then upped it for 2nd strike.
I just can't stand the likes of Souness etc coming out crapping on about 'that's not the Liverpool way' etc etc.
Anyone ever watched any football from his era? Biggest set of grubs ever. Glass houses and all that.
FA (and everyone else) needs to look at it for what it was. A dude bit someone. He got suspended.
Move on.
To be perfectly honest Football authorities are pretty blaze about punishing violent offences point blank.
To me 10 weeks is pretty lenient considering the circumstances and the also sideline event is that some of this suspension will be served in the off season makes it a bit of a farce
The biting didn't even follow any type of fight/scuffle event before hand. All that happened was Ivanovic and Suarez tussled for the ball as happens between centr half and striker 1000 times a season. Suarez for some reason then launched into Ivanovic and bit him on the arm. Most natural actions in this case would be a punch headbutt etc but the bite is well out of left field. Considering it is also the second incident of biting from Suarez I am surprised a more sterner sanction wasn't called for.
The last bloke who got a pretty severe sanction for OTT reaction/violence was Cantona for the infamous kungfu kick on a spectator. He got 9 months. I am surprised Suarez didn't get something heftier and rivalling the Cantona ban
Its 10 games not weeks, therefore four games this season and 6 next season.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
some of the wowser flogs in here ffs
i can see you all spitting out your morning earl greys in shock
hilarious histrionics
if he dove in broke ivanovics leg, he would have been given a smaller ban than the 10 he got
apparently, the taboo of biting is greater than actual physical harm
worth more than cantona, lol
So none of the WCQ for Uruguay or other international friendlies count???Quote:
Originally Posted by furns
He does have a mean set of teeth.
If he had Rooney's baby teeth he'd have only got the 3 games.