Page 206 of 218 FirstFirst ... 106156196204205206207208216 ... LastLast
Results 4,101 to 4,120 of 4346

Thread: The Politics/Religion/Conspiracies Deathmatch Thread

  1. #4101
    Senior Member Frodo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    2,471
    Quote Originally Posted by traffic light View Post
    RA stuffed it for siding with lgbti propaganda EG being hysterically offended when no others in the list were.
    Actually I worked out the second part also.

    The RA didn't side with LGBTI, they sided with the majority of Australia. (i.e their fan base)

    Just because the Membah comes on here rambling about his favourite novels doesn't mean any sane person agrees with him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeterpool View Post
    I do it just for you. My goal in life is to have a quote in someone's signature.

  2. #4102
    Senior Member MFKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    14,937
    Quote Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET View Post
    Then he shouldn't of signed a contract saying agreeing that he couldn't post that kinda hate speech online
    No such thing as hate speech

    That just a term snowflakes use at speech they don't like

    All speech is potentially offensive
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post

    Double-eff-aye should introduce a 3rd division and dump these ice addict welfare living scumbags straight there. dont even let them get their stink anywhere near 2nd division.

  3. #4103
    aka WLG pv4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,279
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    No such thing as hate speech
    Incorrect.

    There are laws relating to hate speech.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate...s_in_Australia
    OK

  4. #4104
    Senior Member MFKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    14,937
    Quote Originally Posted by pv4 View Post
    Incorrect.

    There are laws relating to hate speech.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate...s_in_Australia
    Just more BS from the leftist snowflake generation to pander towards their equality of outcome dream which they will never achieve


    Hate speech still doesn't exist and these laws are just tools for them to club those they disagree with
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post

    Double-eff-aye should introduce a 3rd division and dump these ice addict welfare living scumbags straight there. dont even let them get their stink anywhere near 2nd division.

  5. #4105
    Senior Member StannyCFCJET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Newy
    Posts
    4,236
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Just more BS from the leftist snowflake generation to pander towards their equality of outcome dream which they will never achieve


    Hate speech still doesn't exist and these laws are just tools for them to club those they disagree with
    Pretty sure both sides agree hate speech exists but you keep living in fairy land
    Quote Originally Posted by lquiquer View Post
    Welcome to the circus ... And I can't argue any of your points... In contention for best first post of the year... ��


    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    love at first sight

  6. #4106
    Senior Member MFKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    14,937
    Quote Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET View Post
    Pretty sure both sides agree hate speech exists but you keep living in fairy land
    No anyone who believes in freedom of speech has no support for the concept of hate speech

    They feel you are free to say whatever the **** you like whether they agree with you or not


    Those who believe in Hate Speech support censorship and are happy to erode their own freedoms just so as to get their woke points up

    We all know which camp you are in
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post

    Double-eff-aye should introduce a 3rd division and dump these ice addict welfare living scumbags straight there. dont even let them get their stink anywhere near 2nd division.

  7. #4107
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    13,872
    Quote Originally Posted by Frodo View Post

    The RA didn't side with LGBTI, they sided with the majority of Australia. (i.e their fan base)
    to be fair, RA sided with the money.
    and thats how sport is run, so doing that shouldn't be seen as any sort of radical approach.

    again, having data to point to in defence of their point is vital, as is public sentiment.
    but RA only really cared when the money was in trouble.
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    And I don't argue with FR. The bloke is a legend and deserves great praise for his contributions to football in the Hunter.
    He is also the second best poster on the entire Foz behind you
    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    sometimes there's more to life than just winning
    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverRed View Post
    What a deadset ****ing coward **** you are
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Seems like I am WRONG

  8. #4108
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    13,872
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    They feel you are free to say whatever the **** you like whether they agree with you or not
    yeah nah. thats not exactly how it works.
    we have defamation laws. and they work.
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    And I don't argue with FR. The bloke is a legend and deserves great praise for his contributions to football in the Hunter.
    He is also the second best poster on the entire Foz behind you
    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    sometimes there's more to life than just winning
    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverRed View Post
    What a deadset ****ing coward **** you are
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Seems like I am WRONG

  9. #4109
    Senior Member Frodo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    2,471
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    No such thing as hate speech

    That just a term snowflakes use at speech they don't like

    All speech is potentially offensive
    Calls people who don't like things being said snowflakes whilst not liking something that's being said...

    Therefore, Member is a snowflake.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeterpool View Post
    I do it just for you. My goal in life is to have a quote in someone's signature.

  10. #4110
    Senior Member MFKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    14,937
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post
    yeah nah. thats not exactly how it works.
    we have defamation laws. and they work.
    Defamation only applies for false claims
    If the statement made is true you can say plenty of bad shit about someone that dafames them
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post

    Double-eff-aye should introduce a 3rd division and dump these ice addict welfare living scumbags straight there. dont even let them get their stink anywhere near 2nd division.

  11. #4111
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    13,872
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Defamation only applies for false claims
    nope. wrong again boss.
    https://www.sbs.com.au/news/sarah-ha...eyonhjelm-case

    read this and tell me where the lies are.
    little buddy still had to pay out 120 large.
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    And I don't argue with FR. The bloke is a legend and deserves great praise for his contributions to football in the Hunter.
    He is also the second best poster on the entire Foz behind you
    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    sometimes there's more to life than just winning
    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverRed View Post
    What a deadset ****ing coward **** you are
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Seems like I am WRONG

  12. #4112
    Senior Member MFKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    14,937
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post
    nope. wrong again boss.
    https://www.sbs.com.au/news/sarah-ha...eyonhjelm-case

    read this and tell me where the lies are.
    little buddy still had to pay out 120 large.
    The article makes no reference to what he said

    The only comment he made in the article was made in parliament which he can't be sued for

    As for whatever it was that cost him 120k there is no mention of it in the article
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post

    Double-eff-aye should introduce a 3rd division and dump these ice addict welfare living scumbags straight there. dont even let them get their stink anywhere near 2nd division.

  13. #4113
    Senior Member StannyCFCJET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Newy
    Posts
    4,236
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    The article makes no reference to what he said

    The only comment he made in the article was made in parliament which he can't be sued for

    As for whatever it was that cost him 120k there is no mention of it in the article
    Be quiet you snowflake, Grown ups are talking
    Quote Originally Posted by lquiquer View Post
    Welcome to the circus ... And I can't argue any of your points... In contention for best first post of the year... ��


    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    love at first sight

  14. #4114
    Senior Member Frodo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    2,471
    Quote Originally Posted by StannyCFCJET View Post
    Be quiet you snowflake, Grown ups are talking
    See Stanny, when I said it there was some tact and guile to the comment. I bet the member had a little giggle at my sly little "sit down" retort.

    This here is just childish. If YOU can't handle his comments, you should maybe leave while the adults talk.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeterpool View Post
    I do it just for you. My goal in life is to have a quote in someone's signature.

  15. #4115
    Senior Member MFKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    14,937
    Quote Originally Posted by Frodo View Post
    See Stanny, when I said it there was some tact and guile to the comment. I bet the member had a little giggle at my sly little "sit down" retort.

    This here is just childish. If YOU can't handle his comments, you should maybe leave while the adults talk.
    That is what we call getting owned
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post

    Double-eff-aye should introduce a 3rd division and dump these ice addict welfare living scumbags straight there. dont even let them get their stink anywhere near 2nd division.

  16. #4116
    Senior Member StannyCFCJET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Newy
    Posts
    4,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Frodo View Post
    See Stanny, when I said it there was some tact and guile to the comment. I bet the member had a little giggle at my sly little "sit down" retort.

    This here is just childish. If YOU can't handle his comments, you should maybe leave while the adults talk.
    Can't handle it? His comments are just something to give me several laughs throughout the day
    Quote Originally Posted by lquiquer View Post
    Welcome to the circus ... And I can't argue any of your points... In contention for best first post of the year... ��


    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    love at first sight

  17. #4117
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    13,872
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    The article makes no reference to what he said

    The only comment he made in the article was made in parliament which he can't be sued for

    As for whatever it was that cost him 120k there is no mention of it in the article
    he repeated and expanded the comments he made in Parliament on TV.

    “It was in a Motion to consider self-defence. There was a Motion calling on the Government to make it possible for women to protect themselves, thinking in terms of the Eurydice Dixon case or even the Jill Meagher case, and there was the Green’s Senator Janet Rice was making a one minute statement which suggested that it was all men and that men need to change their behaviour and so forth. Sarah called out, I don’t know the exact words because there was a lot of chatter going on, but it was to the effect of, ‘men should stop raping women’, the implication being all men are rapists. Now Sarah’s, this is not a criticism, but Sarah is known for liking men. The rumours about her in Parliament House are well known, so I just said ‘well stop shagging men then Sarah’. I mean it just doesn’t make any sense if you think they’re all rapists why would you shag them? So she took great offence at that which is her problem not my problem. In retrospect I, you know, um she um, she has a right to shag as many men as she likes I don’t care you know … but she took great offence, she came and called me a creep, I told her to … am I allowed to say the F word on TV?”
    “She is known for lots of relationships with men, she had a quite famous one with a, with a Liberal member of parliament a few years ago, Barry Haase, now there’s, I am not criticising her for that, she is perfectly entitled to do that, but the double standard”

    heres the whole judgement if you want a read.
    https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.a...19/2019fca1981

    also, you can absolutely be fined and jailed for saying shit under Parliamentary privilege.

    It aint the free for all you assume it to be.
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    And I don't argue with FR. The bloke is a legend and deserves great praise for his contributions to football in the Hunter.
    He is also the second best poster on the entire Foz behind you
    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    sometimes there's more to life than just winning
    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverRed View Post
    What a deadset ****ing coward **** you are
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Seems like I am WRONG

  18. #4118
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5,428
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post
    he repeated and expanded the comments he made in Parliament on TV.






    heres the whole judgement if you want a read.
    https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.a...19/2019fca1981

    also, you can absolutely be fined and jailed for saying shit under Parliamentary privilege.

    It aint the free for all you assume it to be.
    To be charged with defamation there needs to be an element of truth in what you say about someone. If someone says something that's 100% fabricated / untrue it's almost impossible to prove because once puffery comes into play the wheels of any defamation case tend to fall off.

  19. #4119
    Senior Member Frodo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    2,471
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dunster View Post
    To be charged with defamation there needs to be an element of truth in what you say about someone. If someone says something that's 100% fabricated / untrue it's almost impossible to prove because once puffery comes into play the wheels of any defamation case tend to fall off.
    That's very untrue. Like almost 100% false.

    Defamation is any false statement that hurts you/your brand financially.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeterpool View Post
    I do it just for you. My goal in life is to have a quote in someone's signature.

  20. #4120
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Weimar Germany
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Defamation only applies for false claims

    If the statement made is true you can say plenty of bad shit about someone that dafames them
    *puts postgraduate law hat on*

    Truth is not an absolute defence to defamation in New South Wales.

    It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that—
    (a) the matter carried, in addition to the defamatory imputations of which the plaintiff complains, one or more other imputations (contextual imputations) that are substantially true, and
    (b) the defamatory imputations do not further harm the reputation of the plaintiff because of the substantial truth of the contextual imputations.

    Basically in layman's terms. To use truth as a defence the facts must be well known and not causing further harm to the plaintiff because everyone knows about it.

    Secondly. If the publication was delivered with malicious intent. Just about forget about trying to use "truth" as a defence.
    Last edited by Skirt Boy; 06-12-2019 at 11:41 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •