just a question, is the problem that the EJ's don't have enough cash to pay a scout and rather are waiting for the prospective parents to stump up the cash for their young lionels? or is it that there's a fairly glaring hole in scouting from top to bottom by the local, state and national federations, that's probably been allowed to fester due to sokkah politics that has been going on for donkeys years?
i grew up playing hockey in newcastle, and even though there was perceived bias towards certain clubs from parties at times (i've been guilty about complaining about it in the past, for the most part wrongly i must admit), the clubs and selectors generally didn't miss much, the best kids were in the development squads and were given every opportunity to then go for higher representative honours and the like.
i don't know if it's changed now, but the general notion was that the best kids were left to play for their clubs through the season, and were for the most part spread across all the clubs (cyclical changes/family dynasties aside), and came together for a yearly state tournament where the best kids were picked for a state team, then went to nationals and into further hockey and so on. by keeping everyone playing for their clubs, rather than trying to concentrate all the talent into one side, the competition bred super competitive, hard-working and cohesive teams that played the game in a dynamic (and distinctly different) manner across clubs, rather than a bunch of precious angels enslaved to a curriculum.
i don't know too much about junior soccer pre-jets in newcastle, but there does seem to be an excessive focus on "elite squads" and "academies" and the like, rather than solid, week-in, week-out competition. is the competition just too fractured in junior soccer? i.e. ID's, elites or whatever else is the go?
forgive the rambling, hopefully said something of note