Page 11 of 50 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 986

Thread: 2022 National Premier League thread

  1. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldy View Post
    Red card all day. Cookers throwing themselves around like wrestlers. That wont wash for the season.
    "But Cooks Hill did receive some good news during the week with Tommy Smart’s one-game suspension overturned
    following a review by the Obvious Error Panel, leaving him free to play after he was sent off in the first half of their clash with Maitland."

  2. #202
    Senior Member Buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,083
    Quote Originally Posted by fozphantom View Post
    God bless Tommy, great player but you can almost guarantee he will be sitting on the sidelines at some stage of the year with a suspension
    Jaliens gives me the horn

  3. #203
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    348
    No wonder cooks H throwing themselves about. They have the judiciary sewn up.

  4. #204
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by Negative Police View Post
    No wonder cooks H throwing themselves about. They have the judiciary sewn up.
    Forum name checks out lol

  5. #205
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Aberglasslyn
    Posts
    207
    Any idea how he got let off? Are they allowing Bar TV footage to be used this year?

  6. #206
    космонавт-исследователь boz-monaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1991
    Posts
    456,916,366
    Good to see some sense

    here's hoping that ref gets demoted, it was an appalling decision

  7. #207
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    1,350
    Quote Originally Posted by boz-monaut View Post
    Good to see some sense

    here's hoping that ref gets demoted, it was an appalling decision
    I'd rather he get extra training

  8. #208
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by Negative Police View Post
    No wonder cooks H throwing themselves about. They have the judiciary sewn up.
    Still remember them getting no punishment for playing underage players in the over 35’s comp

  9. #209
    Quote Originally Posted by BS detecor View Post
    Still remember them getting no punishment for playing underage players in the over 35’s comp
    Was that the team that lost all their competition points because he didn't turn 35 till mid season?

  10. #210
    Quote Originally Posted by boz-monaut View Post
    Good to see some sense

    here's hoping that ref gets demoted, it was an appalling decision
    I'll buy you a beer Saturday Nige for being wrong on this one

  11. #211
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen View Post
    Was that the team that lost all their competition points because he didn't turn 35 till mid season?
    The team that didn’t get kicked out of the comp for cheating? Yeah

  12. #212
    Quote Originally Posted by BS detecor View Post
    The team that didn’t get kicked out of the comp for cheating? Yeah
    Yeah the one's who suffered the consequences of their actions, we are talking about the same team then.

  13. #213
    Pfft. 35 mid season? Sounds like an honest mistake on a rego form. I know rules are rules but those comps start mid april and we're probably talking 2? 3 months? How did the assoc not pick it up??

    IIRC, is this the team, that before 35z played a team from maitland who had someones brother as a ringin keeper in a grandy?? dont think the medals came their way after the truth came out. Not really sewn up then. is it.

  14. #214
    космонавт-исследователь boz-monaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1991
    Posts
    456,916,366
    Cooks Hill 0 Weston 5

    not a good day with Covid meaning the manager and a few out exposing our lack of depth

    also, what bullshit is this about a 35s team in this thread? no one cheated, it was a misinterpretation of the rules, which points were deducted and life went on, it was several years ago
    Last edited by boz-monaut; 19-03-2022 at 05:58 PM.

  15. #215
    Senior Member W8 WATCHER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    306
    Excellent goal keeping today from Cookers.
    May e worthy of team of week again.

  16. #216
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by boz-monaut View Post

    also, what bullshit is this about a 35s team in this thread? no one cheated, it was a misinterpretation of the rules, which points were deducted and life went on, it was several years ago
    😂😂😂😂😂 who would have thought you would have to be 35 to play in the OVER 35’s comp. Misinterpretation to some, cheating to most

  17. #217
    космонавт-исследователь boz-monaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1991
    Posts
    456,916,366
    the misinterpretation was that the team thought you had to turn 35 that season, not before being eligible to play - to be honest, they hadn't really read the rules - it wasn't cheating, which implies deliberate action

    they also lost points, in Over 35, D grade, in 2019 - if that's all you've got against Cooks Hill United and chose to bring it up in a thread about NPL, then that says more about you than you realise Craig

    go troll elsewhere

  18. #218
    Ive always argued the rule's a pisstake anyway.
    So, you can be turning an age from 1st jan to 31st dec and play in ages u6 to 18s? 25s ? or what ever the age group is but you get to the old fart havcker leagues
    and you have to be 35 to play?
    lookout the rule doesn;t change. well see team upon team stacking 34 year olds turning 35 in nov-dec just for the advantage. fmd

    bump
    guess adamstowns keeper isnt getting in the team of the week eather. Jake the snake dropped a simple one for the 1st.
    1-4 Valo
    Last edited by fozphantom; 19-03-2022 at 07:19 PM.

  19. #219
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by boz-monaut View Post
    the misinterpretation was that the team thought you had to turn 35 that season, not before being eligible to play - to be honest, they hadn't really read the rules - it wasn't cheating, which implies deliberate action

    they also lost points, in Over 35, D grade, in 2019 - if that's all you've got against Cooks Hill United and chose to bring it up in a thread about NPL, then that says more about you than you realise Craig

    go troll elsewhere
    Wow that’s an interesting response. I’m amazed that this is the topic out of all the threads that got you so rattled. The truth cuts hard it seems

  20. #220
    Senior Member W8 WATCHER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    306
    Quote Originally Posted by fozphantom View Post
    Ive always argued the rule's a pisstake anyway.
    So, you can be turning an age from 1st jan to 31st dec and play in ages u6 to 18s? 25s ? or what ever the age group is but you get to the old fart havcker leagues
    and you have to be 35 to play?
    lookout the rule doesn;t change. well see team upon team stacking 34 year olds turning 35 in nov-dec just for the advantage. fmd

    bump
    guess adamstowns keeper isnt getting in the team of the week eather. Jake the snake dropped a simple one for the 1st.
    1-4 Valo
    Both Watson and Jake H are as bad as each other, neither are capable.
    Clearly showed again
    Cookers need to re recruite a new GK

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •