Page 12 of 178 FirstFirst ... 210111213142262112 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 240 of 3559

Thread: L-I-V-E-R-P-Double O-L Liverpool FC

  1. #221
    Senior Member snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    810
    the uruguayan j griff

    good for the game
    we will loose

  2. #222
    космонавт-исследователь boz-monaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1991
    Posts
    456,916,365
    he just wanted a taste of a champions league team

  3. #223
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,066
    Pffffft, the usual phony outrage.
    I love the 'The club HAS to sell him' line.
    Why?
    Terry, Ferdinand, Cantona, Defoe all pulled some pretty weak ass shit in their time and their clubs all stood by them.
    Why should Suarez be any different?

    Jeez, speaking of embarrassing the good name of Liverpool FC, have you seen Jamie Carragher defend?

    Get over yo'selves.

  4. #224
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post
    Pffffft, the usual phony outrage.
    I love the 'The club HAS to sell him' line.
    Why?
    Terry, Ferdinand, Cantona, Defoe all pulled some pretty weak ass shit in their time and their clubs all stood by them.
    Why should Suarez be any different?

    Jeez, speaking of embarrassing the good name of Liverpool FC, have you seen Jamie Carragher defend?

    Get over yo'selves.
    Don't mention that blokes name on the foz ever again.

    GVE will probably sign him now to take us to more comedy levels at the back

  5. #225
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    17,380
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post
    Pffffft, the usual phony outrage.
    I love the 'The club HAS to sell him' line.
    Why?
    Terry, Ferdinand, Cantona, Defoe all pulled some pretty weak ass shit in their time and their clubs all stood by them.
    Why should Suarez be any different?

    Jeez, speaking of embarrassing the good name of Liverpool FC, have you seen Jamie Carragher defend?

    Get over yo'selves.
    this

  6. #226
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,066
    Alas, forgot to update my post with Ashley Cole shooting a kid with an air rifle at training.

    But please don't let me interrupt the public lynching of 'old bitey'.

    Anyone got a stream to watch for when the residents of Mt Pius set him alight?

  7. #227
    brutally rapes small, cute dogs parksey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,335
    there's a difference between standing by a player when he does something stupid or controversial and standing by a player that does it on a regular basis and seemingly doesn't really gaf about his or the club's image and reputation.
    Quote Originally Posted by snake View Post
    bridges made the world in 6-8 wks

    he then rested by the corner flag and all was gud
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Stubbins
    Hopefully it’s the four players, but, if not, the three, and if not, the two.
    Quote Originally Posted by Maito Mitch View Post
    Do you ever get bored of sprouting the same old crap? You're about as predictable as the punishment on the field we sit through once a week

  8. #228
    in awe of baz GazFish35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,421
    He just wanted to take a chunk out Chelsea's champions league hopes.

  9. #229
    Senior Member Zico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    790
    On Liverpool's twitter (or one of the many accounts from Liverpool) that Suarez has been given a 10 week ban.

  10. #230
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    there's a difference between standing by a player when he does something stupid or controversial and standing by a player that does it on a regular basis and seemingly doesn't really gaf about his or the club's image and reputation.
    I agree.
    Just like when Giggsy was tooling his sister in law innit?

  11. #231
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by Zico View Post
    On Liverpool's twitter (or one of the many accounts from Liverpool) that Suarez has been given a 10 week ban.
    Sounds fair.
    Now lets all move on.

  12. #232
    brutally rapes small, cute dogs parksey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,335
    Quote Originally Posted by plague View Post
    I agree.
    Just like when Giggsy was tooling his sister in law innit?
    looks like you missed the point, champ.
    Quote Originally Posted by snake View Post
    bridges made the world in 6-8 wks

    he then rested by the corner flag and all was gud
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Stubbins
    Hopefully it’s the four players, but, if not, the three, and if not, the two.
    Quote Originally Posted by Maito Mitch View Post
    Do you ever get bored of sprouting the same old crap? You're about as predictable as the punishment on the field we sit through once a week

  13. #233
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by parksey View Post
    looks like you missed the point, champ.
    No I didn't.
    I just don't agree with yours.
    There's a difference.

  14. #234
    Occasional Podcaster furns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Branxton
    Posts
    4,974
    ok so Defoe gets nothing for his chomp in 2006 and Suarez gets 10?
    About as even handed as Terry getting four games for racism and Suarez getting 8.

    wd to the FA for consistency.
    Subscribe to The Jetstream Podcast http://www.newcastlefootball.net/podcast

  15. #235
    infant member plague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    14,066
    Quote Originally Posted by furns View Post
    ok so Defoe gets nothing for his chomp in 2006 and Suarez gets 10?
    About as even handed as Terry getting four games for racism and Suarez getting 8.

    wd to the FA for consistency.
    To be fair though there was never a 'fair' punishment in this case.
    They obvs looked at the first offence which he got 7 for then upped it for 2nd strike.

    I just can't stand the likes of Souness etc coming out crapping on about 'that's not the Liverpool way' etc etc.

    Anyone ever watched any football from his era? Biggest set of grubs ever. Glass houses and all that.

    FA (and everyone else) needs to look at it for what it was. A dude bit someone. He got suspended.
    Move on.

  16. #236
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    To be perfectly honest Football authorities are pretty blaze about punishing violent offences point blank.

    To me 10 weeks is pretty lenient considering the circumstances and the also sideline event is that some of this suspension will be served in the off season makes it a bit of a farce

    The biting didn't even follow any type of fight/scuffle event before hand. All that happened was Ivanovic and Suarez tussled for the ball as happens between centr half and striker 1000 times a season. Suarez for some reason then launched into Ivanovic and bit him on the arm. Most natural actions in this case would be a punch headbutt etc but the bite is well out of left field. Considering it is also the second incident of biting from Suarez I am surprised a more sterner sanction wasn't called for.

    The last bloke who got a pretty severe sanction for OTT reaction/violence was Cantona for the infamous kungfu kick on a spectator. He got 9 months. I am surprised Suarez didn't get something heftier and rivalling the Cantona ban

  17. #237
    Occasional Podcaster furns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Branxton
    Posts
    4,974
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    To be perfectly honest Football authorities are pretty blaze about punishing violent offences point blank.

    To me 10 weeks is pretty lenient considering the circumstances and the also sideline event is that some of this suspension will be served in the off season makes it a bit of a farce

    The biting didn't even follow any type of fight/scuffle event before hand. All that happened was Ivanovic and Suarez tussled for the ball as happens between centr half and striker 1000 times a season. Suarez for some reason then launched into Ivanovic and bit him on the arm. Most natural actions in this case would be a punch headbutt etc but the bite is well out of left field. Considering it is also the second incident of biting from Suarez I am surprised a more sterner sanction wasn't called for.

    The last bloke who got a pretty severe sanction for OTT reaction/violence was Cantona for the infamous kungfu kick on a spectator. He got 9 months. I am surprised Suarez didn't get something heftier and rivalling the Cantona ban
    Its 10 games not weeks, therefore four games this season and 6 next season.
    Subscribe to The Jetstream Podcast http://www.newcastlefootball.net/podcast

  18. #238
    Senior Member snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    810
    some of the wowser flogs in here ffs

    i can see you all spitting out your morning earl greys in shock

    hilarious histrionics

    if he dove in broke ivanovics leg, he would have been given a smaller ban than the 10 he got

    apparently, the taboo of biting is greater than actual physical harm

    worth more than cantona, lol
    we will loose

  19. #239
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by furns View Post
    Its 10 games not weeks, therefore four games this season and 6 next season.
    So none of the WCQ for Uruguay or other international friendlies count???

  20. #240
    in awe of baz GazFish35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,421
    He does have a mean set of teeth.
    If he had Rooney's baby teeth he'd have only got the 3 games.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •