Because stats prove everything here's a stat that proves everything.
In the 13 years since Roman took over, Chelsea have got 161 more EPL points than Liverpool.
In the 13 years before he took over Liverpool scored 94 more EPL points than Chelsea.
See, stats.
Close thread.
Is this another way of saying Chelsea bought success??Originally Posted by plague
No it's a stat that proves stuff.
Once you have a stat there is no need for nuance.
It's right there in your face.
It was Blackburn Rovers under Jack WALKER who ****ed everything
He bought the EPL
He led to the blue print Abramovich and the Arabs at Man City have followed
Knock arsenal and Man Utd all you want
Their success has been down to their hard work and consistent good work
Unlike Man city who bought everything they have had
Unlike Chelsea who have bought everything they had
Go have a look at Chelsea at the formation of the EPL they were a no name mid to lower table shit club doing nothing just like West Ham
Chelsea won 1 league title and a FA Cup in nearly 100 years then they bought everything
So all the players from arsenals invincible season were youth products were they?
When they were kids Henry and Bergkamp used to climb that big oak tree on the hill at Highbury to peep over the fence at their idols.
An interesting thing I've found.
Chelsea First Team squad players: 25
Out On Loan players: 36
Arsenal Squad: 29
Out on Loan: 6
Man Utd squad: 26
Out on Loan: 6
Man City Squad: 26
Out on Loan: 18
Liverpool squad: 30
Out on Loan: 11
Spurs squad : 24
Out on Loan: 3
Barca: 24 and 12 on loan
Real Madrid: 24 and 7 on loan
Bayern: 24 and 3 out on loan
Don't know what it means, if it means anything, i just found it interesting Chelsea have so many players on their books.
We use it as a profit system but Now with Conte our youngsters actually get a chance in the first team
I was just surprised, like I'm not saying it's a bad thing, good on them for finding ways to make money. They are also players their rivals can't sign.
never accept that deluded fiction. manu bought the comp for years. They also had the best manager so didnt have to pay quite as much.
Sounds like sour grapes
My point is Man u and Arsenal were winning their titles on the back of being big well run clubs
Spuds Liverpool are both big clubs but we're not run so well hence the lack of titles
Blackburn Chelsea Man City bought their position at the top of the game
Leicester some how arsed it in something that defies logic
Is this the same Man utd that a few years back were looking to sell their home ground to raise funds to stay afloat?? The same man utd that were bailed out by the yanks??? Yep they were really well run.
That is a ridiculous point. rofl
Chelsea are a well run club and they spent what they had to to win the league as every club has cept Lesta. Manu used to spend the most but retained players avoiding repeated costs. And for a little while now they have finally been out spent and are not winning titles. Man city have spent a lot but dont quite have the squad this season. Arse spent just alittle under the sh1tload that others have. A billion today is similar to a few mill in the 80's, dont get confused now.
Sour grapes? Your havin a larf.. Anyone here who puts their emotion on the line in epl is in for a rough time. wine is for bums.
Last edited by hawk; 31-01-2017 at 11:11 PM.
Chelsea may well now be a well run club
They may well have been a well run club as they grew from the 80k 90s when they were crap
But don't try dressing up the reality that they achieved success based on spending excessive levels of cash to bridge the gap and achieve success
Excessive levels of cash that could have turned Brentford Charlton Millwall into EPL elite
Tough game a draw possibly fair result. Costa you mung you gotta berry those penalties lad.
Only saw the second half, and thought Liverpool looked pretty good. Unlucky not to score 2.
Bit then chelseas misssd penalty.
Costa has that damn Suarez ability to infuriate the opposition with his little tricks and tactics, looking for contact and going down. If he's on your team aka Suarez, you love him. If not, you hate him.
By all accounts Chelsea looked better in the first half, so draw probably fair, both teams could've won.
Liverpool were all over us with possession and the high pressing and the fact that chelsea couldnt keep the ball, But for all their possession they did nothing with it and their only well worked attack pretty much and they scored.
We did nothing either so draw is fair
kante was immense too btw.
And Moses has certainly improved since his loan at Liverpool.
As someone said attack is more important than defence. there's always next century
Last edited by StannyCFCJET; 08-02-2017 at 10:34 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
