Quote Originally Posted by Premy View Post
Like it or not a boycott is an abandonment, also like it or not suggesting it will come with criticism.
The fact that you're trying to take the high road and make jibes about us being superior fans because we will stay loyal reeks of hypocrisy.

The last line maybe approaching but as you suggested a boycott/abandonment is the last line, why not suggest another form of of protest before we get to the last option instead of suggesting a boycott as the first option.
Please come on. that's a pretty long bow to draw. A boycott is nothing like abandonment. A boycott is a statement that whilst we support the club we will not turn up in numbers to make it look like everything is rosy. A boycott is saying, you guys in charge are embarrassing us supporters with what you are doing so we are going to embarrass you by leaving you with an empty stadium to be broadcast on TV. Abandonment is leaving all together, never to return or worse supporting someone else. Sure a boycott of a game isn't the nicest thing for the players who give there all. Maybe banners and songs are the way to start. A big banner across the eastern grandstand saying Tinkler out or fix this or simply help us might be a good way to start. I will conceed to you that as a first line of attack a boycott isn't the nicest thing but when push comes to shove drastic action is needed and Tinkler doesn't exactly listen to anyone (except the team of lawyers he must pay a fortune to) and Stbbins is certainly living up to the stubbin part of his name with his reluctance to quit.

Lets agree that a boycott is for a last dramatic action and other things can be done first but it is something that all supporters should consider might need to be done.