My opinion is irrelevant, what I’m saying is they won’t use the footage so there is no concrete evidence other then from the experts on hereQuote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
Printable View
My opinion is irrelevant, what I’m saying is they won’t use the footage so there is no concrete evidence other then from the experts on hereQuote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
Not every person is inclined to throw hand bags the moment something inciting happens..Quote:
Originally Posted by MisplacedPasses
I'd expect any player whom was spat on to get their club to make a formal complaint - something adamstown have done, someone wrote.
I can't comprehend Oxborrow doing anything else except spitting in that bartv footage. It looks pretty clear to me and I'd believe the Buds player if he said that's what happened.
The Adamstown player made the claim and his club has has taken it further, Pretty much irrelevant what most think on here eh ?. Surley none could so thin skinned to allow a few opinions on here rile em. People will form a opinion based on there interpretation of what they are seeing. Me thinks the vision don't look good for Ox and just using your logic how may times in a weekend would we see players claim somebody hacked on them just to get them sent off, Could we say doubtful ?.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisplacedPasses
Wouldn't want to be Northern's shoes about now however, If they go down the road of not accepting the footage time and time again to cut out low life grub acts in back play they will certainly leave themselves open to harsh criticism. At some point regardless of how evidence is obtained if it is damning and i repeat " if " then subsequent penalties should be imposed for indiscretions, Particularly off the ball stuff which is more often than not the grubbiest of acts.
But not being a part time on call replacement at best HAL player i am willing to concede i know SFA.
The Town have more issues then an alleged spit, they are in all sorts
Them, Valo and CharlestownQuote:
Originally Posted by Alton
???Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Please elaborate...Quote:
Originally Posted by Alton
Heard a Charlestown player failed to front yesterday, no phone call, nothing, not a good look, I wonder if he gets to go to Melbourne, I won’t name him, someone else can do that
I will have a crack and say LjuboQuote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRed
Will be very interestingQuote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRed
Wrong............ I thinkQuote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
Cal Lewis ?
Nope, defender
Kev Davidson
Wheels falling off, in allsorts , Cracks appearing , They're gone.
Davispon played, so if a defender it could only be Laman or SuliniQuote:
Originally Posted by ForeverBlack
Thanks fortnightQuote:
Originally Posted by 380
Don't know what game you were watching Go Away . Davidson definitely didn't play. Go and watch bartv footage. Looks like Smart and Pippen playing as the 2 centre backs ?Quote:
Originally Posted by GO AWAY
Sorry mate, was just going off the NNSW site, Davison was named, didn't know he didn't play, btw, it was young jethro elkington, pippen hasn't played all year from injuries. Not wholly in the loop anymore hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by ForeverBlack
Think about it GAQuote:
Originally Posted by GO AWAY
Got a few moreQuote:
Originally Posted by GO AWAY
Writing is on the wall.
All over red rover.
Surely if the 2 Adamstown players say they witnessed it and they made a report straight to referee that would be enough evidence without the footage to prove guilt. Although the footage cant be used you would think that Oxborrow and the club would show some integrity in admitting his guilt or at least put up a reasonable excuse for his actions as seen on the vision, which I believe would be impossible. Its without doubt it happened so he and the club needs to take the punishement and move on and accept he will always have the grub tag with him. If he denies it regardless of the outcome he will be a lying grub.Quote:
Originally Posted by 380
Sentence handed down Thursday according to the herald conveniently after FFA Cup match. Could potentially be 5 weeks. If so Magic gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dontknowmuch
It doesn't say 5 weeks. It says it's 5 weeks if it's dealt with on the field by the ref.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnno
i.e if the ref gave him a red card for spitting he would getan automatic 5 weeks.
The ref didn't see it or act . So now it's one players word against the other as northern have stated many times that they won't use bartv footage.
Oxborrow won't admit he did it and Magic will not drop their star player.
Case closed
Spot onQuote:
Originally Posted by ForeverBlack
Just a quick note to the moderators. There is a pretty clear cut case of reputations being impuned with regards to the above statement. I think most lay people would consider that the reference to brother in law is in fact a slur on either or both individuals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnno
Wouldnt it be a slur if the poster was making remarks about the 2 gentlemen after a decision had been made??Quote:
Originally Posted by terryk
So far no decision yet
All the poster had done so far was mention an existing relationship between people whom would have different competing objectives on the matter
I not reading anything there as a Slur on anyone
Really ?, I reckon but certainly not speaking for Johno but i would think he is getting at the " potential " for a conflict of interest. We here claims like these all day long in society do we not. Not a week goes by where we we don't hear the Govt of the day make reference to Brendan O'Connor and his brother Michael and use terms like conflict of interest. Just my thoughts but i am the first to admit i am no legal beagle by any stretch.Quote:
Originally Posted by terryk
Perhaps if Johno was to go back and edit post to include " potential " then that may alleviate any concerns eh ?.
Any news on Spittlegate
Got told by a someone close to the Magic club that there is a hearing scheduled for next week?Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverBlack
I think it would be an issue if they weren't brother-in-laws. But if they are, isn't that just stating a fact? Note: I personally don't know if they are or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by terryk
Johnno hasn't passed judgement on them being brother-in-laws, he's just stated that both of them have a big test on their hands.
Would have loved to see the young guy give Oxborrow a clip around those Mad Magazine ears on the field and then leave it at that...Quote:
Originally Posted by pv4
Smart move, then he would have been gone for several weeks and Oxborrow would have got nothing....Quote:
Originally Posted by Rappin' Ronnie Reagan
Edgeworth finished all over Maitland at end of the game and unlucky not to get all 3 points.
Very true indeed. If Ox did spit a clip around the ear is nowhere near sufficient. Spitting on a opponent is f*&^#ng dog act from somebody with no idea. Pissweak human being does not even come close.Quote:
Originally Posted by late_to_the_game
Ljubo retired.
Another wheel falling off. In allsorts
I don't think NNSWF need a call on relegation, some clubs will sort it out for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by 380
Are they not brother-in-laws? If so that's just stating a factQuote:
Originally Posted by terryk
Has anyone heard how Ox the Llama went at his hearing tonight