Quote Originally Posted by 380 View Post
The Adamstown player made the claim and his club has has taken it further, Pretty much irrelevant what most think on here eh ?. Surley none could so thin skinned to allow a few opinions on here rile em. People will form a opinion based on there interpretation of what they are seeing. Me thinks the vision don't look good for Ox and just using your logic how may times in a weekend would we see players claim somebody hacked on them just to get them sent off, Could we say doubtful ?.

Wouldn't want to be Northern's shoes about now however, If they go down the road of not accepting the footage time and time again to cut out low life grub acts in back play they will certainly leave themselves open to harsh criticism. At some point regardless of how evidence is obtained if it is damning and i repeat " if " then subsequent penalties should be imposed for indiscretions, Particularly off the ball stuff which is more often than not the grubbiest of acts.

But not being a part time on call replacement at best HAL player i am willing to concede i know SFA.
Surely if the 2 Adamstown players say they witnessed it and they made a report straight to referee that would be enough evidence without the footage to prove guilt. Although the footage cant be used you would think that Oxborrow and the club would show some integrity in admitting his guilt or at least put up a reasonable excuse for his actions as seen on the vision, which I believe would be impossible. Its without doubt it happened so he and the club needs to take the punishement and move on and accept he will always have the grub tag with him. If he denies it regardless of the outcome he will be a lying grub.