I won't be watching it then.
Printable View
The last time I watched Blade Runner was back in 1982 when it was released.
Watched it last night on Netflix [1982 Theatrical Version]and surprisingly it's still a great film that has stood the test of time very well.
I might watch the Directors cut one day - but have reservations given it's supposed to have removed the voiceovers and changed the ending.
(Blade Runner) 2049 was a great movie, but not quite as good story wise imo. Visually stunning though
no, its written as fact.
here is the definitive list of bad Marvel universe movies.
Iron Man 3
Thor 2.
Avengers blah blah Ultron.
the Hulk one (ha, you aint trying to distance yourself from that one fanboyz).
All the Ant man ones.
Spiderman: Homecoming NOT EVEN THE IMMORTAL MICHAEL KEATON COULD SAVE THAT SPIDEY CRAP.
GOTG 2: again, they had Kurt Russell and they ****ed it up.
Doctor Strange.
Black Panther.
The rest lie on the scale from 'meh' (Thor, IM2) to 'dope' (Winter Solider/Infinity War).
Now, again, this is a true and correct list, you can have a different opinion, and opinions are fine. But if your opinion is different from this list then you are wrong.
oh, and Logan was boring and all the X-Men movies are bad.
I thought Ant Man was fun and I liked Dr Strange as well. But I wouldn't call them good movies.
100% with plaguesey that Winter Soldier was fxxxing dope
Highly recommend Restrepo to anybody. **** Jarhead and all those other war movies. This is the real deal
Has anyone watched the Ben Affleck Netflix heist movie yet?
Going to try and give it a run tonight.
Also: All of Narcos was dope. Drug movies and drug TV is awesome, especially the murders. Drug people never just kill someone. There's always a little extra effort put in.
Appreciate the hustle.
The only way Avengers Endgame will be any good is if they have a post credits scene where Deadpool turns up and hopefully kills them all.
After 3 hours of sugary bullshit undoing all the cool bits of Infinity War only a big dose of absurdity will suffice.
But we'll prob just get some unknown 18yr old actor picking up Captain Americas shield and be all like "20 MORE MOVIES OF THIS BULLSHIT, ASSHOLES"
I watched Lincoln [The Spielberg Film] on Netflix last night.
Daniel Day Lewis is a superb actor - but that's not enough to save this terrible piss weak borefest of a movie.
I wish Spielberg would go back to what he does best action / suspense more so than biographic / historic pics which are not his forte.
Hard to believe the guy that made Duel could make this Lincoln shit.
I actually didn't mind Ready Player One (SHUT UP COMIC BOOK NERDY NERDS).
Apart from that I've no idea if I've seen a Spielberg flick since Saving Private Ryan.
i enjoyed it.
what did blow me away though, was how well it was made, and that it had legitimate movie stars in a movie ON NETFLIX.
we are a lot closer than we think to big time movies being available at home as the same time as the theatre.
its only gonna take someone from one of these huge movie franchises like Mission Impossible, Fast N Furious, Marvel etc to do a deal and release one on the platform.
then its all gonna get wild.
im all for it, **** going to the movies, and ill happily pay $20 for direct access at home on day 1 for a new Vin Diesel masterpiece.
I watched Cafe Society last night on Netflix. Not Woody Allen's best pic by a long way but decent enough to pass the time.
A lot better than Blue Jasmine but not up to the level of a Midnight in Paris, Annie Hall, or Take the Money and Run.
Also, Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse is a ****ing visual masterpiece. Loved it.
This actually looks surprisingly good..
The trailer makes it appear to be more of a Taxi Driver style as opposed to comic book super-villain style..
Jared Leto's shithouse version can go get more crappy tats and fvck off..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRc3WviXk2M
The only person that thinks less of Taxi Driver than me is Jodie Foster - but there's not a lot in it.
Sorry to be negative. But I think this is gonna have a lot more style than substance. I know people are making the Scorcese references, but this is going to try to be an indie movie on a superhero budget.
Jared Leto didn't do a bad Joker, he was just in a very bad film.
I found it disturbing in that it glorified a stalker, normalised child prostitution, and it was over the top / stretching too far. It was also less than 2hrs long but it felt like 4 hours.
Not a Scorsese fan really. He takes things further than is necessary in all his movies - and there's really not a lot of variety to his work. It's pretty much the same shit with a different title every time [with few exceptions other than Hugo]. It's a bit like how Burton Films re all the same, Luhrmann... and so on.
Compared to someone like Fellini, Kubrick, Wilder, and Bergman he's a hack.
Ok, so its a personal/moral choice about the storyline that you mainly don't like?
Does that mean you hate horror movies or things like that?
E.g. I haven't watched Hostel (don't know if its a good or bad movie), but I've traveled through Europe and stayed in hostels enough times to not want to even have the storyline to that stuck in my head.. (although I have heard there are really hot chicks in it, haha)
I hated The Wolf Of Wallstreet.. I could see it was a good movie that was well done, but glorifying a prick that ripped people off, sorry plague, a bloke that "made great business decisions" was pretty sickening to me..
I read his books a while back and the first thing i thought when they announced they were making a movie was how the hell they'd fit everything in.
If it was made now, the whole saga would be a perfect 8 part Netflix series. The movie cut out so much of how he did it, and seemed to only concentrate on the 'fun' parts of what he did (hence making him the sympathetic character. The books paint him as a way way way bigger crook than the movie and there isnt a lot 'cool' about what he did.
having said that though, anyone who hands over money to a cold caller under the assumption of instant wealth doesnt deserve their money to start with. those suckers were gonna lose their cash somehow, Belfort was just ahead of the game.
My issue with Scorsese is that he's got very limited range when it comes to conveying an idea / message / telling a story. It's not the genre or themes either - because Kubrick films like A Clockwork Orange, The Shining, Lolita, and The Killing I've watched and enjoyed many many times.
In Taxi Driver - the main character is a dick from the first scene to the last. No matter how many times you watch it - it's the same movie. Watch A Clockwork orange or Lolita 20 times each and you will still be finding new things about it or even changing your view / opinion of how things are portrayed.
In general I like simple movies that don't take themselves too seriously. Scorsese makes very simple films that take themselves far too seriously to the point of being almost parodies - though it's unintentional.
I'm a big fan of Woody Allen films - but I would not call them great movies - it's more a case of him making films which appeal to me. However, the films of Allen's that I don't like are the ones that try to be more serious. They fail to impress because he simply doesn't have the tools to make them work - much the same as Scorsese.