^^^???
it's $22, or just get a childs :yap:
^^^???
it's $22, or just get a childs :yap:
And who would you replace? Brown started getting better last week so I'm inclined to let him play this week, plus Virgilli and Goodwin own the flanks ATM. Could put him on the bench, but where would Taggart or Bridges go? Taggart not playing would mean GvE is crucified, no Bridgy, well that's another waste of a visa spot.Quote:
Originally Posted by weston
Has Ribz been a waste of a visa spot so far? Probably. Waste of a player? Well if he hasn't been impressing GvE, them no.
delivery + credit card feesQuote:
Originally Posted by snake
****en ridiculous
Hope for his sake he inserts a buttplug goin to that shite hole.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimario
They are good points. Brown looked better the last 2 weeks. Previous weeks though i don't think he has been very good. I think he was brought back a little to quick from injury considering how long he was injured for. If he is going to get better from now on though than i guess there would be no need to replace him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas477
I like Bridgey, but at the end of the day he is just another striker for us who has never really got the goals. Between Heskey and Bridges imo we only need one and i'd be keeping Heskey. I'd still like Bridges as the club as a coach and maybe even ass. man in the future.
I wouldn't mind seeing Goodwin on the left wing, Virgilli on the right, Heskey in the middle and Ribeiro in behind and swap Griffo with Virgilli sometime in the second half or vice versa. I dont think Griffo has been playing aswell in behind Heskey.
I just want to see more of Ribeiro, when he signed i read about some of the skill etc. he has and with the games he has played i thought he played well, the only downside would be his defiencive duties, or lack off, even when he did put the effort in defending, he wasn't all that great. If i could go and watch the youth games and get more of a look at how he plays maybe i'd be able to see myself why GVE isn't playing him but with what i have seen i'm just not sure why he hasn't got more game time than what he has, considering Brown's previous form.
I was thinking about it the other day, it will be by far the most expensive game in NSW to attend.Quote:
Originally Posted by q-money
Dat Bluetongue experience :oops:
how are these cunce broke?
I agree with Brown, brought back way too early but came good last week, hopefully it continues. Bridgy, well I'm a fan, but you're right he hasn't really got the goals for the club, but I don't doubt his passion for the club and would love to see him as a coach or even eventually manager.Quote:
Originally Posted by weston
Maybe Goodwin could drop to LB and Griff to LW with Ribz/Brown behind and the other on the bench. I doubt RyGriff will ever be dropped to the bench. As with you, I haven't seen too much of Riberio to make a judgement call. What I will say is if he is getting regular game time in the youths, he must be close to the first XI - no point playing a bloke who you don't want.
this is actually a very good question. substantial transfer fees on a regular basis, no marquee players garnering big wages, players paying for their own lunches.Quote:
Originally Posted by q-money
boggles the mind.
let's boycott it, man citeh styleQuote:
Originally Posted by q-money
Ah, he's back. :yap:Quote:
Originally Posted by scozzygt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbX10QeOFHw
celery at his brilliant best. you can just tell this guy is about 65.
all it's missing is a rap interlude by benny boi.
Oh wow man how awesome was that? So cool that they did that thing that every other halfwit has been doing for about 5 years now.
I think I saw it on the footy show 2 years ago. Those Mariners doodz are so on trend.
Imagine when the government gives them broadband their funnies will know no bounds.
Funny captions to dogs playing pool perhaps?
You gaiz. So funni.
could probs fill that holeQuote:
Originally Posted by weston
A little under 36 hrs till kickoff and pv4 hasn't mentioned kit clashes.
What's going on?
Probably still too busy crankin' it to the idea of Ljubes And Rubes together again..Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Fish
maccas is on king st, farken!
roffffff. dat video, geeez.
sif tinks actually cares about wog ball.
There won't be no kit clashes this time. I spose we will wear our away kit with white shorts and socks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Fish
wat
Parole panel corruption needs to be scrutinised on a regular basis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeen
http://resources2.news.com.au/images...ile-heskey.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Gary Fish
http://resources3.news.com.au/images...1-mariners.jpg
Kit Clash???
Only people who are ****ing colour blind would think this is a kit clash
Just like the idiotic idea as to why we still have this line of thinking that one kit has to be dark coloured kit and the other a light coloured kit.
Anyone aware of the real line of thinking for this philosophy of Light V Dark kit??
Pv4 always seems to come out with something when we play them.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
might have to wait and see what the keepers are wearing.
Thought the light v dark was some rule FIFA had for back in the days of black and white tv. Dunno if that's true or not.
Rose is a ceyunt of the highest order.
I hope at least we have some passion this game unlike last game where we just seemed to roll over
Lol, joking right, what's $28 times zero again?Quote:
Originally Posted by q-money
I agree..Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeen
I'm starting to view Rose and Pedo (Bojic) as verging on shitmuncher Hutcho status..
Precisely right Fish. The idea was brought in for the 80's and 90's where it was common for TV's to be black and white in 3rd world shitholes. As a result Fifa wanted dark kit V Light Kit to assit viewers in these impoverished parts of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Fish
Now considering the HAL is only available in Australia via Foxtel (not withstanding illegal internet streams!!) I would assume in this day and age that the amount of Black and white Tv would be negligible.
If you are wealthy enough to pay for Foxtel it is safe to say you as a TV conossieur ain't watching it on a Black and White CRT box with the pull out knobs and have at least gone the full hog for colour!!!
Hell even on welfare a gypo can afford a Plasma or LCD in high Definition.
This being the case why does the HAL still play to this archaic rule???
As far as I am concerned we should be playing in our home kit where ever possible. So only when we play WSW Adelaide Heart away should we have any remote chance of a kit clash.
For those with colour blindness issues. GTFO.
I would wear pink if it meant beating them gypos, doesn't matter what you wear the 3 points taste the sameQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
I would wear pink if it meant beating them gypos, doesn't matter what you wear the 3 points taste the sameQuote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
I'm colour blind (partially) and this is fine.... What i hate is our away games at Melbourne Heart. Red and White stripes v Black and White stripes. The white stands out on both kits and i can't tell the difference between the red and black. If Melbourne payers turns their backs to the tv all game than i would be right as the back of their shirts are mainly red where as the Jets are still striped.Quote:
Originally Posted by MFKS
Agree. Those two will replace Hutcho if he happens to get a China gig.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bon
Even less if you buy a kids ticket BBBBrrraaaaaaaaahahahahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by NewcastleForLife
We'll swell their pityful numbers today.
Mitchells starting boys.... Enjoy...
Neville Mitchell back.
Hoole benched.
So Hooles effort last week was worse than Neville sitting in the stands?
Gotcha Gaz, way to put confidence in the boys.
Oh wait Brown keeps his spot and Virgili can start off as well.
.....and Neville! In other words Neville just has to be fit and he will start, I thought you pick players on form and Hoole done very well last week.....oh silly me we're talking about GVE here.Quote:
Originally Posted by weston
The pubic haired head muppet playing his head f%^k games again, what a wacker.
2-0 loss. Mitchells in