would love to go to a gay marriage. reckon it would be a hoot and a holler. sick reception, guaranteed.
Printable View
by definition, isn't it a bigger waste of my time, given he said he is closed to alternative explanations? compare that to myself, where my acceptance to a particular theory may be changed by new contradictory evidence. e.g, if god appeared in the sky saturday, i'd be singing hyms in church on sunday.
by definition, isn't it a bigger waste of my time, given he said he is closed to alternative explanations? compare that to myself, where my acceptance to a particular theory may be changed by new contradictory evidence. e.g, if god appeared in the sky saturday, i'd be singing hyms in church on sunday.
Well **** Me.
5 Believer in the Official Stories
That's not how I would have had you pegged.
If science is absolutely correct and logic is also good any doubts put on the story should see you in the Believer in the Not Believing Camp I would have thought.
I do though find it absolutely amusing that when the opinion of religion comes up you are absolutely definitively adamant in your faith of science and logic being correct.
Yet these examples particularly the JFK and 9-11 ones see you turn your back on science and logic as being definitively correct and by taking the position you have you obviously believe in something that both science and logic actually contradicts
Thought to be perfectly fair I couldn't ever see you accepting the Moon Landing as a Hoax as it if one of sciences alleged greatest feats and if it was deemed a fraud you would have a few issues
On another note though Snake seeing as you don't believe in Roswell being legit but as a some what strong believer in science evolution and logic and all that what are your thoughts on the possibility of alien life form??
Basically do you believe in little green man and flying saucers even if these little green man and flying saucers don't quite live up to the Hollywood comic stereotype with their image.
Most people would say you would have to be a little crazy to believe in them but surely you would have to believe in them being possible and probability wise being most likely???
Bigger things going on here Member.
Important question, do you believe in unicorns?
Don't know why you keep asking me this.
Should really be asking Snake as he believes in Evolution
According to him it should only be a matter of time as the horse evolves with a horn on its head.
Either that or Snakes scientist mates could speed it up a bit with some genetic engineering with rhinos and horses
Being that there are references to unicorns in the bible maybe the unicorn has already been and gone
If the moon landings were fake the Russians would have let everyone know about it. The fact that the Russians accepted defeat in the race to the moon is proof enough for me.
Snake as per this question 4 about reading scriptures not becoming canon
I take it we are referring to verses that are now not found in the bible anymore yet were once in it a thousand years ago etc???
:tongue: So you can pick and choose which part of the good book to believe in and practice in, oh I think I'm getting the hang of this.
Sure as hell hope we don't have to believe and practice in this bit of the "good" book
15:12-13
whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman.
I'm apologies if you feel disrespected by this statement Hauss but I find it rather ironic that you are defending Christianity yet you get upset by someone forcing an opinion onto another.
I'm happy to answer these questions, but just a quick question. It seems that all these questions are designed to direct you toward a conclusion that you have already reached. Is that how scientists approach a topic? I thought that designing an experiment so that it was biased toward the result you want is a big no no. You've almost written my answers for me.
yeah I'm sticking up for my man Member here. you can't go picking apart every minute detail of the books.
everyone on here has broken the laws of the society we choose to live in from time to time.
besides, as he said, if you do the wrong thing just ask for forgiveness. simple.
and Hauss, don't take this stuff too personally. i think everyone is more than respectable towards your beliefs. it doesn't mean that people don't find the ideas of your beliefs absurd.
in the same way you have probably had your say on players, coaches and ceo's of this club being just as unbelievable. but those same players managers and ceos probably truly believed they belonged here.
i think there is a difference between saying religion is stupid, versus saying you are stupid for believing it.
not quite. i'm just cutting straight to the point to save time.
if the bible is reliable, then the abrahamic god exists, cares abour us, will judge us etc. if ghe bible is unreliable, then all that may still be true, but it can't be used as supporting evidence. however, the hypothesis for a god usually comes the axiom of the bible being reliable. ergo, proper scientific enquiry is to test the veracity of the bible. hence the motivation behind a few of the questions :)
the other questions are to raise your consciousness about how truly arbitrary your religion is. i'm probably correct in thinking you're christian because you were raised in a christian family. most apples don't fall far from the tree. if we were both indian, we would be having the same coversation about hinduism...
je suis snake
terrorists tend to be religious narcissists
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...tz-jihadi-john
"Delusions of grandeur, a fear of failure and a need for admiration"
remind you of anyone on this forum?
no no, it was in response to the accusation from someone else that if you don't adhere to all the rules in the bible then you can't be a proper christian.
i know plenty who take bits and pieces from it to shape their journey in life. not sure if thats makes them a plastic christian or not but i don't think us non beliebers should take that angle in the argument (not that you were, it was someone else).
Anyway Snake back to my little green men question and your beliefs in their existence.
It was me.
I find it hard to believe someone that only believes in half a story. If they only believe in the part of something that suits them then I believe when they are to portray something then they will only portray what suits them, hardly the full scope on something. How's the expression you can't have your cake and eat it.
The Church is built on foundations of hearsay and depictions of people who only portray part of the good book. Ministers, Fathers what ever name they want to go by are happy to preach stories from a book but are quick to tell us not to take all those stories literal, surely one can forgive me for not knowing what stories to take literal and what stories to not.
I'm still trying to work out what insulted hauss so much in the first place. As far as I can tell it was when snake said that he believes in zombie stories. So that's too insulting now? sheesh
For all I care you could say that I suck Darwin's cawk, no need to get precious about it.
Saying that we aren't allowed to ridicule or make fun of beliefs which quite clearly require a large leap of faith sets a dangerous precedent for society.
a dude a while back named drake derived an equation to estimate this using the product of a set of probabilities. number of stars x fraction with planets x fraction of planets with conditions conducive to life x. ... etc. otoh, i don't know if moons were included here, which would expand the probabilities slightly.
we currently have good estimates for some of these parameters, but not for others. the universe us a big place, and the number if extrasolar planets discovered is accelerating with improved measurements. the number if.earth-like planets is increasing also. this stuff is hot science right nao.
once upon a time, there was a theory called vital force theory, which stated that organic molecules can only come from organic sources. thwn one day, this dude whose name escapes me, prepared urea (a chemical in your piss) from inorganic chemicals. vital force theory, and one if gods roles, died shortly after.
it was.thought that these molecules - particulay those in RNA require a solvent like water to form. RNA is particularly interesring because it copies itself! kinda like life does....
anyway, it turns out you don't need liquid water.to form many of these molecules - they exist in comets - and so are ubiquitous to tbe solar system. since i don't happen to think our solar system is all that special, they're probably common to the universe. a big place.
so, are.there little green men?
visiting us -probably not, although i do watch ancient aliens for a giggle.
elsewhere in the universe? i'd be stunned if there wasn't. although the data isn't in yet. (it only takes.one drake probability to be zero, for the whole thing to be zero...) would love for it to be solved in my lifetime, but it's probably asking too much.
you make a fair point, but from reading Members posts and my own experience there are a lot of people who use the books as a guide to form their own theory on life. id be shocked if the there are more of those in the world than your extremist "all or nothing" type of lads.
i think everyone agrees that extremists are the ****ing worst.
oi Member, so what are your thoughts on the likes of the Westboro baptist church?
cool with it, not cool?
interested to hear a religious mans perspective as id assume all non believers would think they are the worst humans on the planet.
Do other forms of life exist in this universe - almost certainly.
Are those other forms of life interested in having contact with us - almost certainly not.
It's hilarious to me that people think humans are the superior and only form of life in the cosmos. Why would any beings smart enough to develop means for travelling massive distances through space want to hang out with a race intent on blowing each other up over trivial differences and watching cat videos on the internet?
So you believe in the possibility of little green men.
Ok
I will leave the insults of you being loopy crazy etc alone but lets at least take note that your position on this subject would leave some severe doubts on your level of sanity in the modern world.
Now as far as your science goes Why has Science not been able to prove the existence of these little green men??
I am taking the answer to this is that science is not complete yet?? Ie Science has not discovered its limit and is still a long way from achieving it
Would this be a fair narrative to explain the situation as to why Little Green Men are not confirmed as legit just yet