A one nil thumping, rosebuds in all sortsQuote:
Originally Posted by the big V
Printable View
A one nil thumping, rosebuds in all sortsQuote:
Originally Posted by the big V
Buds looked unlucky in both 1sts and 20s. Will cause problems for a few clubs.Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRed
That’s a joke right? Adamstown were horrible is firsts and will probably finish last. Olympic should of won by 5 except for poor finishingQuote:
Originally Posted by Y Bloo?
Hamilton doesn't have an out and out quality striker. Therefore finishing throughout the year may be difficult.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
I didn't watch the game. Just bringing up a discussion point. I don't recognise anyone in their points list as a front man with a proven track record. But there are a lot of names I don't recognise.
Adamstowns physical presence in 1sts a threat with some good young guns gaining experience.
So Oympic “should of” won by 5, except they didn’t.... well observed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
Are titles given to teams that “should of” won, or just the teams that actually win? I’m confuse.
Yeah I was stating that Adamstown are rubbish which they were. And Olympic did win you half witQuote:
Originally Posted by Cabaye#4
CCB V Maitland
18s 1-2
20s 1-0
1st 3-1
just watched replay on bartv and i admit olympic had a couple of good chances but i thought the game was much tighter then from what you are going on about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
and to think im talking shit maybe you should go and speak with guinno who i ran into yesterday saying adamstown were tougher then what he expected..
Perhaps I "should of” used more spacing between paragraphs as you clearly missed my point, as I didn’t ask who won the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueboy
Maybe you “should of” spent more time in class instead of puffing billies. Each to their own, champ.
Should have, should have, should have, should have.....
And Hamo werent all that great. decent game though
Chest beating doesnt payQuote:
Originally Posted by the big V
Not much went right on the day for the Valo boys and 3 points could have/ should have blah blah
Yep it was a tough loss but it happens
Go Away
Nice goal for jarrod
Did he then get sent??
Big improvers in firsts
How long you guys playing at CB Complex for? Not a bad field but bigger plans must be happeningQuote:
Originally Posted by the big V
Thanks, yeah was a nice goal. unfortunately was sent for a second yellow, now misses Lakes on good Friday.Quote:
Originally Posted by the big V
Its a junior ground, NNSW should never of allowed it, Forever Red's coup at South Cardiff is Wembley compared to this ground, bring back Southy.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk
Wow! come to think of it you are right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
It will happen Stanley, be patient my friend, chicken feathers galore, in regards to CB complex, please what were they thinking, the original gypsies on the move againQuote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
great call forever, GYPSIES somes up everything about that shambles club..Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRed
well maybe a bit harsh about the club , more shambles around where there home ground is supposed to be..
Bravo FRQuote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRed
Drove past Cahill oval today, magnificent. If Valos preference is to play at a junior facility Belswans should jump on it now.Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRed
Weekend Predictions
Lakes 0 - 3 Charlestown
Maitland 2 - 0 Adamstown
Hamilton 3 - 1 Valentine
Jaffas 2 - 0 Weston
Magic 2 - 1 Edgy
What's happened at Cahill?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Charlestown 2-0Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Maitland 4-0
Hamilton 2-1
Jaffas 3-0
2-2
CCB - 4-0Quote:
Originally Posted by magician
Maitland - 3-0
Olympic - 2-0
Jaffa's 5 - 1
edgy 1-0
Has the cricket pitch been removed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Lakes 0 - 4 Charlestown
Maitland 3- 1 Adamstown
Hamilton 3 - 2 Valentine
Jaffas 4 - 1 Weston
Magic 3 - 1 Edgy
Why would Belswans want to play on a cricket pitch and share it with Lakes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Lakes 1 - 4 Charlestown
Maitland 3 - 1 Adamstown
Olympic 2 - 2 Valentine
Jaffas 1 - 2 Weston
Magic 2 - 3 Edgeworth
Keep the goals coming!!
Drainage, irrigation installed and the ground re turfed, the place looks like a postcardQuote:
Originally Posted by Dontknowmuch
until 1 rainy drugby league weekend ****s it up for the rest of the seasonQuote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Lakes 0 - 5 Charlestown
Maitland 6 - 1 Adamstown
Olympic 1 - 1 Valentine
Jaffas 5 - 1 Weston
Magic 4 - 2 Edgeworth
BUT!!!! It still has a cricket pitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Azzurri 5-1
Maitland 3-1
Valo 1-0
Jaffas 3-0
Magic 3-1
Just take it out like Olympic have done at Darling St!Quote:
Originally Posted by Premy
Havent the cricket bludgers had a whinge on the Olympic Facebook pageQuote:
Originally Posted by Cabaye#4
Wasn't that Synthetic at Darling St? No chance in hell are you getting LMCC to dig up a turf pitch and reinstall it every year. Belmont Cricket have been at Cahill for as long as I've been alive they aren't going anywhere anytime soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cabaye#4
One would think that Phoenix have learnt from past mistakes and rather than constantly trying to use someone else's ground they would be looking to secure there own Facilities. There is a nice little spot right near Valentine Swimming pool that has plenty of potential I would be banging on LMCC's door asking about if I we're Phoenix.
As was the case with Olympic, unless you submit your request with a large sack of dollar bills.councils will not listen.
Does valentines have cash to help build a new facility? Ñ?
Dinero es muy importante
i think it may have been the case that at olympic the cricket was a low league or junior cricket played. Where as at Cahill oval Belmont District grade cricket is played, big difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonPablo
For some reason I thought Lakes Rugby League team and Belmont Cricket Club played on the same ground. Is this not the case anymore ?