Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
Why do they need to set up a buyer NOW??
Surely getting our ownership right is imperative for the long term and it is completely incorrect for a short term marriage of convenience shot gun wedding etc.
Where exactly is the due diligence?? Look what happened last time the FFA tried arranging a shotgun wedding for us when they ousted Con?? Who's to say this bloke from Dundee may not be as committed as we hope he is in 2 years time??

Surely the go would be to stabilise the club and hold on to it for a period of time assessing the options and then finding the right fit?? It ain't like they can't make any money off it either as the Heart/Wankers sales have shown that money can be made

As for making sure their moves ain't overturned then if they are worried about legal action from Tinkler surely their licence agreements need to be looked at from their end as after Tinkler and Palmers shenanigans they need to be a bit more secure in the FFA's favour to prevent a repeat elsewhere??

As for going off half cocked pretty certain they have already shown a degree of ridiculous patience. The farcical way Tinkler treated 5 players and 3 coaches under contract last week should have seen action on some front taken by the end of the week.
Save money
Doing due diligence for past few months
AFC not keen on FFA owning clubs, creates conflict on interest, doesn't help us maintain a CL spots.
I reckon they have, but they'd still have a process they need to follow.
Action has been taken, remember though the media need to be played in this thing too.
By not jumping to it, they stop playing the game Tinkler was trying to, when he kept breaking stories during acl games.
They're letting hm know it'll be done on their terms, not his.