Page 31 of 37 FirstFirst ... 212930313233 ... LastLast
Results 601 to 620 of 732

Thread: 2016 NEW FM League thread

  1. #601
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,974
    Quote Originally Posted by LongSufferingFan View Post
    While I can hear all the Lakes haters cheering (Zico and friends) about two Lakes teams missing the GF I do think it spells trouble for Southy in the 23s.
    I am guessing that some of the Lakes 19s will at least come off the bench or perhaps even start for their 23s on Sunday. Some serious quality in that 19s team who will add some strike power to Lakes 23s if they get a run.
    Aren't the 23s not good enough who have been there all year,

  2. #602
    Senior Member Zico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    795
    Quote Originally Posted by LongSufferingFan View Post
    While I can hear all the Lakes haters cheering (Zico and friends) about two Lakes teams missing the GF I do think it spells trouble for Southy in the 23s.
    I am guessing that some of the Lakes 19s will at least come off the bench or perhaps even start for their 23s on Sunday. Some serious quality in that 19s team who will add some strike power to Lakes 23s if they get a run.
    How did I get branded a Lakes hater?

  3. #603
    Quote Originally Posted by ForeverRed View Post
    Aren't the 23s not good enough who have been there all year,
    I don't know for sure but just thinking out loud.
    Makes sense to me that if you have four grades playing semis then your 23s subs are probably going to be 19s players that have already played a full game.
    As their 19s are gone then the subs will be fresh reserves and I can't recall their names but the front three for the Lakes 19s have all played higher this year and may have even played first grade at some point.

    Handy players to have fresh on your bench.

    Now I know Southy have the same options but I think the Lakes subs might be better quality and could make the difference - thats all Im saying.

  4. #604
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by LongSufferingFan View Post
    I don't know for sure but just thinking out loud.
    Makes sense to me that if you have four grades playing semis then your 23s subs are probably going to be 19s players that have already played a full game.
    As their 19s are gone then the subs will be fresh reserves and I can't recall their names but the front three for the Lakes 19s have all played higher this year and may have even played first grade at some point.

    Handy players to have fresh on your bench.

    Now I know Southy have the same options but I think the Lakes subs might be better quality and could make the difference - thats all Im saying.
    Richardson, Ward and Russo would be the three 19's players you're thinking of. They bring a lot more attacking threat than those that are in the Lakes' 23's. Neither Lakes or Southy are the most attack-focused team. Will be likely physical and bringing these guys on late could play a major part.

  5. #605
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Lakes 3- 0 in the 17s

    Shambolic refereeing at the end

    Ref awards a penalty.
    Books a player
    Shows him the red for a second yellow and then after the kid argues with him seems to change his mind and leaves the kid on the park.


    Another epic referee failure


    How hard is it to get a basic like this right???

  6. #606
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,921
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Lakes 3- 0 in the 17s

    Shambolic refereeing at the end

    Ref awards a penalty.
    Books a player
    Shows him the red for a second yellow and then after the kid argues with him seems to change his mind and leaves the kid on the park.


    Another epic referee failure


    How hard is it to get a basic like this right???
    Why did he leave him on?
    Was it his first yellow?
    Referee can change his decision at his discretion providing play has not resumed.

  7. #607
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung View Post
    Why did he leave him on?
    Was it his first yellow?
    Referee can change his decision at his discretion providing play has not resumed.
    I am assuming he ****ed up as it was only his first yellow and not a second???


    Changing his mind before play resumes etc is irrelevant.

    The bloke ****ed up somewhere.

    How hard is it to take down numbers correctly??
    How hard is it to review your numbers correctly??

    Amateur hour refereeing.

    On another note Bel Swan's 3-1 winners in the 19s

  8. #608
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,921
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    I am assuming he ****ed up as it was only his first yellow and not a second???


    Changing his mind before play resumes etc is irrelevant.

    The bloke ****ed up somewhere.

    How hard is it to take down numbers correctly??
    How hard is it to review your numbers correctly??

    Amateur hour refereeing.

    On another note Bel Swan's 3-1 winners in the 19s
    Why? If he made a mistake, he rectified it?
    Maybe the guy looked Familiar.
    Would be worse if he was stubborn and didn't change his decision and sent a guy off he shouldn't have.

    How'd the ref go in 19s?
    Belswans deserved that a lot more. Actually played some good football.

  9. #609
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung View Post
    Why? If he made a mistake, he rectified it?
    Maybe the guy looked Familiar.
    Would be worse if he was stubborn and didn't change his decision and sent a guy off he shouldn't have.

    How'd the ref go in 19s?
    Belswans deserved that a lot more. Actually played some good football.
    Hey let's just face facts

    He ****ed up.

    As soon as he reached into the pocket and pulled out the red that is his first mistake
    His second was he had a bit of time between the yellow and the red so his next **** up was to not check his records correctly
    His third and to me is his biggest failing was HE LSTENED TO THE PLAYERS

    3 glaring **** ups that are basic level issues

    Stop defending it and making excuses for poor work


    On another note Lakes 3-0 over a very disappointing Southy in 23s

  10. #610
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    HT

    0-0

    BelSwans the better side just.

    But it a pretty boring affair so far

  11. #611
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,921
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Hey let's just face facts

    He ****ed up.

    As soon as he reached into the pocket and pulled out the red that is his first mistake
    His second was he had a bit of time between the yellow and the red so his next **** up was to not check his records correctly
    His third and to me is his biggest failing was HE LSTENED TO THE PLAYERS

    3 glaring **** ups that are basic level issues

    Stop defending it and making excuses for poor work


    On another note Lakes 3-0 over a very disappointing Southy in 23s
    Meh, he made a mistake and he corrected it.
    Would you prefer he remained stubborn and sent somebody off incorrectly?
    At least he had the maturity and balls to change his decision (as the laws of the game allow him to do) unlike others who are too arrogant and obnoxious to ever admit they are wrong.

  12. #612
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung View Post
    Meh, he made a mistake and he corrected it.
    Would you prefer he remained stubborn and sent somebody off incorrectly?
    At least he had the maturity and balls to change his decision (as the laws of the game allow him to do) unlike others who are too arrogant and obnoxious to ever admit they are wrong.
    Yeah he made a mistake.

    Basic level skills for a referee.

    Issue red cards appropriately
    Keep records
    Check Records correctly

    All basic level skills failed at.

    Yet your the one defending him unable to admit the reality he ****ed up and it not good enough.

  13. #613
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,921
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    Yeah he made a mistake.

    Basic level skills for a referee.

    Issue red cards appropriately
    Keep records
    Check Records correctly

    All basic level skills failed at.

    Yet your the one defending him unable to admit the reality he ****ed up and it not good enough.
    No, I'm not saying he didn't to anything wrong. I'm saying he doesn't deserve the shit you're lumping on some guy officiating an under 17 match.
    Yeh he screwed up and issued the red card. But he changed the decision when he realised it was incorrect. Was the game affected by his screw up that he corrected. I think not. The eventual outcome was correct and the errors were made when the ball was not in play.
    If that's the worst error you have to whinge about, I think he did pretty well.

  14. #614
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,921
    Least it's a better second half.
    0-0 about to start second half of extra time

  15. #615
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,921
    Wallsend on penalties!

    3-2 I think.
    Bel swans missed their first two! Eek. Always uphill from there. Thought they were the better team too.


    Maybe it was 4-3
    Last edited by Bremsstrahlung; 28-08-2016 at 06:42 PM.

  16. #616
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    What's the go with Northern not allowing people to stand behind the goal in a shoot out??

    What people standing behind the goals is gonna put the player off any different than people yelling banging on fences etc??

    If it such a big issue why hold it at the of the ground with a crowd??
    Why not use the other end at Jack McLaughlin??

    Pretty poor form really when penalty shootout are regularly held with crowds behind the goals around the world


    To the Muppet who tried ripping the drumsticks out of the Wallsend kids hands. Grow up and act your age

  17. #617
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    What's the go with Northern not allowing people to stand behind the goal in a shoot out??

    What people standing behind the goals is gonna put the player off any different than people yelling banging on fences etc??

    If it such a big issue why hold it at the of the ground with a crowd??
    Why not use the other end at Jack McLaughlin??

    Pretty poor form really when penalty shootout are regularly held with crowds behind the goals around the world


    To the Muppet who tried ripping the drumsticks out of the Wallsend kids hands. Grow up and act your age
    The game was a poor example of 2nd Division football, not much football played at all. Wallsend definetly deserved the win. The refs decision not to dish out cards to Belswans for the same tackles that Wallsend got carded for was very obvious all game. The penalty given to Belswans in the game was not a penalty and Marcus should have had 2 penalties. The teams were very evenly matched but Wallsends effort to play with 10 men for so long made them deserved winners. I'm just wondering if Belswans practice penalties it would be interesting to know.

    Well done to Wallsend lost 6 points and their coach during the season and still come out on top. Also from where Belswans started the year congrats to them for making it the GF also well deserved.

  18. #618
    Quote Originally Posted by Dontknowmuch View Post
    The refs decision not to dish out cards to Belswans for the same tackles that Wallsend got carded for was very obvious all game.
    Sounds abit like last week with kahibah getting cards while belswans weren't getting any.
    Happy for wallsend they probably would have come second had it not been for the points being dropped

  19. #619
    Take a chill pill MFKS - talk about the football not the officiating.
    With a few exceptions that didn't impact the results at all I thought the refs today were pretty decent.

    First grade was always going to be tough to ref and the game never really got going in my view.
    A draw was a fair result.
    23s was a fairly dominant performance by Lakes - agree Southy were disappointing.
    19s was a good game. Belswans always looked in charge but Westy challenged and took the fight up to them.
    17s was game of the day IMO. A real arm wrestle by two teams prepared to play physical - unusual for this age.
    Lakes won in the end but some quality in both these teams.

  20. #620
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    17,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Dontknowmuch View Post
    The refs decision not to dish out cards to Belswans for the same tackles that Wallsend got carded for was very obvious all game. The penalty given to Belswans in the game was not a penalty and Marcus should have had 2 penalties.
    i thought there was a bit of this too. thought that was a pen when wallsend player went down near full time. also thought BSwans created the more chances too.

    but anyway belswans have a great young side, nearly all under 25?, great effort. wonder if they'll all stay.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •