Absolutely is, especially when there's nothing coming from the other end. Anyone that can try to defend that sort of behaviour has rocks in their head.Originally Posted by ha'way the lads
Absolutely is, especially when there's nothing coming from the other end. Anyone that can try to defend that sort of behaviour has rocks in their head.
Carrying on about this but can?t reply in the ZPL thread about a homophobic comment from a suns player
Was dealt with on the day by officials and then by the club. But yeah, go ahead and compare something firstly that you don't know about which is hearsay about an 18 year old third grader in third division with this about the head coach of an NPL club. Whatever makes you sleep well at night champ. Carry on condoning this behaviour as you were.
Not condoning anything. Can?t just pick and choose. Does it really matter what grade it come from dopey.
Heat of the moment? Wake up to yourself.
With the amount of people football brings together from diverse backgrounds, this sort of mentality has to be outed.
Ex jets player with peanuts for brains.
My guess is the spineless mob from Northern won?t take action.
He said it was dealt with on the day by officials and the club afterwards. Would be interesting what it was as a punishment but at least it was not ignored which seems to be what Magic are doing here.
I feel like you might be a bit confused with the fact someone brought up Zone league stuff.
This incident is the Olympic coach calling a Magic player a "f'ing terrorist". Don't see how that's Magic doing anything wrong. And this case has not been dealt with by anyone.
Sorry I meant Olympic not Magic.
To throw a few possibilities out there:
- is it definite that nothing has come of it? Iirc it took a while before the Maj incident at lakes to make it to the public domain. It could be possible that there’s things going on behind the scenes that Joe Public isn’t aware of
- is it possible that Magic have decided not to pursue the matter? In the absence of a complaint, there may not be any case for JG to answer.
- has there been a conciliatory conversation that has gone on that has resolved the matter to the satisfaction of the individual that was “allegedly” vilified?
In all 3 of the above scenarios, I’m not trying to defend the alleged actions. I’m merely stating that things may be in motion that are not in the public domain
Couldn't find an Australia Cup thread so I'll post here
Broadmeadow 5 Bangalow 1
Olympic 2 Alstonville 0
Maitland 6 Belswans 0
Edgeworth 3 Jaffas 1 after extra time
Round 7 drawn this week
Was it me, or did Olympic make 4 subs when they’re only allowed 3?
Middleby Gone
Lawrie Out
5 subs allowed at a maximum of 3 stoppages
But there was 4 stoppages…
Middleby Gone
Lawrie Out
Ok, your original post said 4 subs not 4 stoppages hence my reply regarding subs.
The Herald today reports that Olympic have been given a show cause notice surrounding the terrorist comment
As per The Herald today
"
NNSWF, who administer the region's preliminary rounds of the cup, confirmed on Tuesday that "match officials initially permitted Olympic to use an extra substitution window.
"This was noticed within 90 seconds, the player was removed from the field and cautioned. No further action will be taken."
The caution seems a bit rough….
Assuming it’s for entering field of play when he wasn’t supposed to?
Pretty sure the law phrasing makes mention of ‘without referees permission’. In this instance, it would seem he was given permission (incorrectly)….
Listening to the dialogue there's heroes abusing and swearing before that occurred.
Of course some offended twat will find a cultural cringe then take a dive to win this immature spineless sh1tfest. Get a tissue
Weekend predictions:
Olympic 2 - 2 Weston
Jaffas 2 - 1 Edgey
NL 3 - 1 Rosebuds
Cooks Hill 1 - 1 Magic
Valo 1 - 4 Maitland
Azzurri 4 - 1 Lakes
Olympic 1 - 2 Weston
Jaffas 2 - 2 Edgey
NL 4 - 2 Rosebuds
Cooks Hill 1 - 3 Magic
Valo 2 - 3 Maitland
Azzurri 5 - 2 Lakes
Posting Permissions
