Page 37 of 74 FirstFirst ... 27353637383947 ... LastLast
Results 721 to 740 of 1474

Thread: GVE Gooooooooone

  1. #721
    Senior Member seldom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,622
    Quote Originally Posted by militiamon View Post
    In football you have to take chances and make decisions based on hype sometimes. I see Papas as being a manager who could carry on with the work Gary has started here, but do it in a more effective manner. This is based on his results in the VPL, his experience at the AIS, how players mentioned him more than Gary, his recruitment for us in the pre-season, and public comments from him on footballing matters which show him to be a pretty sharp guy.
    ok fair enough...Jets really need to employ a coach who yeah has the tactical knowhow but very importantly has great man management skills...who this is at A league level I don't fvckn know but really the selection should go through a more stringent process and I dont mean Middleby having a chat over a coffee
    I hope he likes prison food.......and penis

  2. #722
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    2,728
    Lets just hope Neville and Mitchell have get out clauses in there contracts should GvE not be coaching.

    Piss off all three in one hit, how good would that be ?

  3. #723
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    17,380
    Quote Originally Posted by 380 View Post
    Lets just hope Neville and Mitchell have get out clauses in there contracts should GvE not be coaching.

    Piss off all three in one hit, how good would that be ?
    Bam

  4. #724
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    17,380
    Quote Originally Posted by seldom View Post
    Not a GVE fan but not sure you can blame tonights loss on him.Perth played a very defensive game and really if we took our chances we would of won.Don't think there was much wrong with our system just lacked the finishing touch.Thought Goody and Rubes were great and we missed Heskey.I might be an old cvnt but I could of played CB for us today...Smeltz by his lonesome watching the passing grid between our defenders
    collectively this. but not that aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh

  5. #725
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,889
    Couldn't understand why he didn't have the balls to remove Neville, push brilliante to rb, and bring cooper into the midfield to add something extra going forward in that last 20, we needed to win not draw and in the end we got screwed

  6. #726
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,123
    Quote Originally Posted by militiamon View Post
    Yeah, surely there is a better manager than the guy who has won the most championships and premierships, come on.
    Merrick had Archie Thompson in his prime and Kevin Muscat on the field to marshall the troops. When Archie became injured and Muscat started to lose touch Merrick had absolutely no solutions.

    While I'd prefer him over GVE I'd rather the club moved forward with someone new to the league - preferably with overseas experience.

  7. #727
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,363
    It's glaringly obvious now that getting rid of Topor and not re-signing Brockie were arguably the worst decisions in terms of the playing roster in this clubs history. Two players who were already at the club and reaching their prime years as footballers and we release one and don't re-sign the other because they don't fit in the coach's plans and want too much money (Brockie) or are on too much money (Topor). GVE's failings as a coach are never more evident then the way these two were shown the door and are both now thriving at different clubs. Apart from Rubes we lack players who are in the prime of their careers, we have either youngsters with potential or players nearing the end of their career. Topor and Brockie would have provided that balance this season that we have lacked, plus goals (Brockie) and defensive steel (Topor).

  8. #728
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by stopper2 View Post
    It's glaringly obvious now that getting rid of Topor and not re-signing Brockie were arguably the worst decisions in terms of the playing roster in this clubs history. Two players who were already at the club and reaching their prime years as footballers and we release one and don't re-sign the other because they don't fit in the coach's plans and want too much money (Brockie) or are on too much money (Topor). GVE's failings as a coach are never more evident then the way these two were shown the door and are both now thriving at different clubs. Apart from Rubes we lack players who are in the prime of their careers, we have either youngsters with potential or players nearing the end of their career. Topor and Brockie would have provided that balance this season that we have lacked, plus goals (Brockie) and defensive steel (Topor).

    Complete Bullshit. We have made far greater **** ups than that. Signing Ante Milicic to a long term deal at his age, Jardel fiasco, Losing the bulk of our championship winning squad within 18 months , our wonderful history of foreigners and NEVER forget our shoddy efforts at resigning Lord Griffo.

    We may be missing Topor with some of our defensive issues but we don't miss Brockie anywhere near as much as half the Brockie lovers reckon

  9. #729
    Senior Member Thomas477's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Lambton, Novocastria
    Posts
    2,555
    Quote Originally Posted by stopper2 View Post
    It's glaringly obvious now that getting rid of Topor and not re-signing Brockie were arguably the worst decisions in terms of the playing roster in this clubs history. Two players who were already at the club and reaching their prime years as footballers and we release one and don't re-sign the other because they don't fit in the coach's plans and want too much money (Brockie) or are on too much money (Topor). GVE's failings as a coach are never more evident then the way these two were shown the door and are both now thriving at different clubs. Apart from Rubes we lack players who are in the prime of their careers, we have either youngsters with potential or players nearing the end of their career. Topor and Brockie would have provided that balance this season that we have lacked, plus goals (Brockie) and defensive steel (Topor).
    So are you saying that we should have payed more than their worth to keep these two players and eat up more of the limited salary cap? Lets remember Brockie's last season, scored 9 goals, then with ~6 games to go says his target is 10. He then disappears off the face of the earth to only reappear when contract negotiations are occurring. If we still had Brockie, Taggart and/or Virigilli would have been lucky to play half the number of games they have and people would be whinging about that.

    As for Topor, he was pants last season, but put him in front of a top keeper, next to a bloke who tells hm what to do, with Mooy and Ono infront of him, of course he is going to look good. He was good when we had Ljubo next to him as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by sh10 View Post
    Can't believe GVE fluffed all those chances in front of goal tonight, ffs gaz where are your shooting boots
    Middleby Gone

    Lawrie Out

  10. #730
    From memory, Brockie was doing very well last season, but as pointed out above, he was being benched or omitted, hardly a good move by the manager to 'rest' a consistant goal scorer. I think something must have happened between Brockie and Van God that caused the latter to adopt his usual punishment of dropping/benching personalities he doesn't see eye to eye with.

    I think Brockie was one of the first to be let go, and I don't recall any press about him asking too much money at the time. It looks to me as though he had a Whierman done on him.

  11. #731
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,123
    Quote Originally Posted by Football is us View Post
    I think Brockie was one of the first to be let go, and I don't recall any press about him asking too much money at the time. It looks to me as though he had a Whierman done on him.
    Not at all. Brockie was offered a massive contract in China, Jets refused to let him go and yet made no reasonable offer to compensate Brockie for the chance they denied him.

    As you would expect, Brockie felt cheated and left the club. Simple really.

    All public knowledge.

    http://www.theherald.com.au/story/43...eremy-brockie/
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/footbal...inese-contract
    http://www.bet365.com/news/en/bettin...ia-on-his-mind

  12. #732
    Senior Member Thomas477's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Lambton, Novocastria
    Posts
    2,555
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dunster View Post
    Not at all. Brockie was offered a massive contract in China, Jets refused to let him go and yet made no reasonable offer to compensate Brockie for the chance they denied him.

    As you would expect, Brockie felt cheated and left the club. Simple really.
    Why should we have compensated him? The fact is he signed a contract to work for the business and was legally bound to see it out. So what if he was offered more money at another company? I don't see why the Jets should have compensated him for anything given Brockie freely entered a contract that expired in April (?) 2012, for a set wage.

    This is part of the reason I'm pissed that Ryan left, he was legally bound to work for the company and he should have seen out that contract, no matter how much they were offering him. I have no issue with a club paying a transfer fee, but its up the club to accept it and if they don't want to lose a player, its their prerogative to do so.
    Middleby Gone

    Lawrie Out

  13. #733
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    2,728
    Anyways , anymore candidates people would like to mention ?.

  14. #734
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dunster View Post
    Not at all. Brockie was offered a massive contract in China, Jets refused to let him go and yet made no reasonable offer to compensate Brockie for the chance they denied him.

    As you would expect, Brockie felt cheated and left the club. Simple really.

    All public knowledge.

    http://www.theherald.com.au/story/43...eremy-brockie/
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/footbal...inese-contract
    http://www.bet365.com/news/en/bettin...ia-on-his-mind
    Thanks for pointing this out Dunster. I see merit in Thomas477's argument as well though.

  15. #735
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,123
    Quote Originally Posted by Thomas477 View Post
    Why should we have compensated him? The fact is he signed a contract to work for the business and was legally bound to see it out. So what if he was offered more money at another company? I don't see why the Jets should have compensated him for anything given Brockie freely entered a contract that expired in April (?) 2012, for a set wage.

    This is part of the reason I'm pissed that Ryan left, he was legally bound to work for the company and he should have seen out that contract, no matter how much they were offering him. I have no issue with a club paying a transfer fee, but its up the club to accept it and if they don't want to lose a player, its their prerogative to do so.
    I agree with you 100%.

    My post was merely passing on how I would have expected Brockie to have felt about the situation.

    With respect to the players very few of them have any consideration for their fan base.

    That their families cannot survive on $250k a year when the majority of the fans watching them earn less than $50k a year is a bit rich.

  16. #736
    aka WLG pv4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,462
    so much of this last page is tl;dr but what I will say is so many people on here seem so naive about the transfer market. apart from being jack wilshere, there is literally no such thing as loyalty/honoring contracts/fair play/etc in world football. people liken playing professionally as working for a company? then why wouldn't the player go to a higher pay?

    anyone who says we should have kept topor is an idiot. as I predicted, and as it eventuated - he was garbage without ljubo. and he was on $200k+!! and brockie - well I didn't rate him that highly, but the offer the jets gave him, in the context, was disrespectful to him & I'm not surprised he left. but I don't think we're missing him tbh
    OK

  17. #737
    Senior Member militiamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,627
    Quote Originally Posted by pv4 View Post
    anyone who says we should have kept topor is an idiot. as I predicted, and as it eventuated - he was garbage without ljubo. and he was on $200k+!! and brockie - well I didn't rate him that highly, but the offer the jets gave him, in the context, was disrespectful to him & I'm not surprised he left. but I don't think we're missing him tbh
    Agree with both points.

    People keep saying how great Topor is at WS, and what a big mistake it was letting him go. What about Beauchamp? You could say he is a good player for WS as well, but he was ****ing rubbish for Sydney and Heart. Do you think they regret letting him go? Different systems. Ours was never going to suit Topor, not in a million years, so why bother keeping him?

    As for Brockie, good finisher, that's about it. Not a great all-round player who can really make a difference to a season (e.g Smeltz, Griff). And in the end we got Heskey as a replacement, so what are we complaining about? Even Taggart would have been a pretty good replacement, he is a much more complete player imo.
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDyl
    You're funnier on the internet than you are in person.
    Quote Originally Posted by q-money View Post
    the NF law...the longer the thread stays open, the probablity that the thread becomes about joel griffiths approaches 1

  18. #738
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,363
    ^^^
    To say that Topor was rubbish without Ljubo is one of the biggest myths going around on this forum. Ljubo missed huge chunks of season 6 due to injury and Reegz came in, yet Topor was our best player that season....that's a fact, check the stats boys before youz go off half-cock.
    As for Brockie I think that in the last 2 seasons no one has matched the quality of his goals both for us last season and this season for the Nix. He has developed into a striker who can create something from nothing and not just be fed or pick up the scraps.
    Militiamon you say that Topor wouldn't suit our system....what exactly is our system? If Topor was in our defence last night, that second goal probably wouldn't have been score. If anyone has watched him this year for WSW he has saved countless goals by just being in the six-yard box and using his long frame to thwart shots at goal.
    I make my observations on facts and what I actually see not the pre-conceived dribble that some of you on here seem to go on with.
    We've spent $700,000 on a striker and the return has been 9 goals and most probably 7th, 8th or 9th spot yet the "experts" on here think that Topor and Brockie wanted or were on too much coin!!!

  19. #739
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,253
    No experts on here

  20. #740
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by My2BobsWorth View Post
    No experts on here
    That's right, only opinions, but seem people seem to think that their opinion is always right. Give an opinion but back it up with facts, especially the one about Topor being rubbish without Ljubo that seems to be constantly regurgitated.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •