Quote Originally Posted by sapdad View Post
This is always the tricky part.We need to have enough spots that every kid from 9-12 who shows promise gets an opportunity.By opening up spots all the way to a 24th team,it means that the kids at the very top of NPL(1) get constant high level games,and teams below get to build either individually or as a team and get rewarded with taking their teams up or individual kids get picked up in higher level teams.Im still not convinced that we are doing a great job capturing every promising junior playing community at clubs like Mayfield,Cardiff and teams up the Valley to name a few.If i was running a club struggling for numbers id have close relationships with any surrounding community clubs and invite their best kids into the NPL level program if they want.If its done up front and theres something in it for the community club it might be a good relaitonship that benefits everyone.Not sure who was involved with Suburbs on here but they make a great point about losing their best community kids to JDL whilst not being able to run it themselves.There has to be a way for kids to get a chance and filling these 24 teams whilst at the same time not killing community clubs who do so much great work.

First ask yourself - whats in it for the FA and Member Federations to care if a community club collapses?

Then ask yourself - what's in it for the FA and Member Federations if big clubs with drawcard names can have multiple JDL/SAP teams?

Then you have your answer as to why nothing is done to help community clubs.

The money flows up in football in Australia. Community clubs are locked out of the tier above them, premier clubs are locked out of the tier above them. Semi-pro clubs are locked out of the professional tier.

Rego funds a lot of that. You pay a lot less rego at community level.