Quote Originally Posted by 380 View Post
Id love to know how Paramount came up with the subscription figure that subsequently enabled them to reduce the monies paid to the APL citing a lack of subscriptions.

Was the club membership model + Paramount subscription used as the soul metric ?.

Take me for example my Paramount subscription has never been a add on box tick to my Jets membership, I subscribed independently. My primary motive for a Paramount subscription was the A League but here is the kicker. Has it been included in the KPI Paramount have used to justify a reduction in there payment for the broadcast rights ???

I know of at least 3 other household who's subscription is independent of there A League club membership but the primary reason.

The potential for Paramount to manipulate and exclude theses subscriptions figures in this way has always bothered me, especially when they are so critical to what Paramount has to pony up for financially

Would be a great question for the new bloke or our seldom seen seldom heard from EC.
The fee paid by Paramount to the APL has not changed, the distribution of that money by the APL to clubs is the only thing that?s changed, don?t get confused peeps, the APL still received the amount owed from paramount, that didn?t change