Page 58 of 112 FirstFirst ... 848565758596068108 ... LastLast
Results 1,141 to 1,160 of 2222

Thread: 2013 NBN State League Thread

  1. #1141
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,841
    2all edgy v weston

  2. #1142
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    137
    Magic v Jaffas
    17s 8-0 (magic 17s are quality!)
    19s 2-1
    23s 0-1
    1st 1-3!

  3. #1143
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    The ball was crossed in from 2-3 yards away and hit the blokes arm. According to the rule book it has to be intentional. The bloke barely had time to get out of the way and I would see that penalty appeal waved away approx 75% of the time. That was ball to hand rather than hand to ball.

    As for the Goal keeper Kale was going round him at the penalty spot when the keeper dived in and missed the ball and collected Kale. How is this not denying a goal scoring opportunity?? The defenders were still chasing Kale and Kale would have got to the ball first and had an open goal from 8-10 yards out. As blatant as a Red Card professional foul as you will ever see.

    Any way Blind Freddy you weren't the ref and are trying to justify your decisions???
    Couldnt agree less.
    First PK ball was crossed-defender arms in air in an un natural position-hand ball PK
    2nd PK-attacker changed direction and moved away from goal towards edge of 18 yd area-PK and YC-referee was spot on with all 3 penalty decisions
    I am quite comfortable with the decisions made by the referee because he got them all correct.
    Come back to me when you have qualified as a referee by passing a LOTG examination.

  4. #1144
    Senior Member seldom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,622
    Quote Originally Posted by outsider View Post
    Couldnt agree less.
    First PK ball was crossed-defender arms in air in an un natural position-hand ball PK
    2nd PK-attacker changed direction and moved away from goal towards edge of 18 yd area-PK and YC-referee was spot on with all 3 penalty decisions
    I am quite comfortable with the decisions made by the referee because he got them all correct.
    Come back to me when you have qualified as a referee by passing a LOTG examination.
    And yet you continue to scrutinize players in the NBN league...what are your credentials there champ
    I hope he likes prison food.......and penis

  5. #1145
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by seldom View Post
    And yet you continue to scrutinize players in the NBN league...what are your credentials there champ
    I have at least played the game.Have you ever been a qualified referee?.I would say that I am qualified to judge players.

  6. #1146
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by seldom View Post
    And yet you continue to scrutinize players in the NBN league...what are your credentials there champ
    Lets all agree mfks is a twat that has an unhealthy obsession for a k Bradbury

  7. #1147
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    137
    lets all agree jaffas pumped magic yewwwwww

  8. #1148
    Senior Member militiamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,627
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    I know he had 4 when the last went in.

    Jets down 2-0 after 25mins
    Phoenix got a penalty for a soft handball. Ball crossed in hit defenders arm from 2-3 yards away. Then 5 mins later some sloppy work at the back allowed striker to race away and finish well.

    Jets were poor until this stage and I was scratching my head as to how phoenix were 2 up cause they were even worse.

    Being 2-0 down seem to do the trick and the Jets overturned the 2-0 defecit to take a 3-2 lead in the last 10 mins of the first half

    First goal came from a Nick Cowburn Free Kick. Absolute pearler and Beckhamesque .

    Then the Fapfest started. Kale drove home into the bottom corner after a dribble and shot from outside the box

    Then Kale won a penalty after getting 1-1 with the keeper he went round him and was dragged down. Deadset red card but only yellow issued. Kale dusted himself off to bury the spotkick

    Second half and Jets were on top and won a second penalty after about 60mins. Finlayson had a shot that smacked the bar. Kale following up and about to tap into the empty net was fouled from behind. Phoenix bloke given straight red.
    Kale buried the penalty to complete the hatty

    Gypo traitor came on then and done **** all.May have jogged at some stage

    Jets continued to dominate and started butchering chances with poor final balls and blokes wanting to get on the scoresheet by shooting when it weren't on

    With about 10mins to go Kale bagged his 4th of the night with a shot the keeper parried but the power was too much and it still went in

    With the 90mins up Remo got on the scoresheet with a finish from a tight angle

    Barely 2 minutes later and it was 7 The ground announcer gave it to Remington though it was ****ing dark down there but I thought Kale got the touch to the cross.


    That ground was a ****ing joke. FMD.

    Credit to Phoenix for running out of food at HT FMD

    U23's Jets 2-1
    U19's Jets 4-2
    U17's 1-1 draw

    Better go have a shower and get the jizz out of my hair
    This is beautiful and deserves to be quoted again.
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDyl
    You're funnier on the internet than you are in person.
    Quote Originally Posted by q-money View Post
    the NF law...the longer the thread stays open, the probablity that the thread becomes about joel griffiths approaches 1

  9. #1149
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    on the hill
    Posts
    146
    lets agree that refs are just people that arent talented enough to play the game....

  10. #1150
    Senior Member Premy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    3,851
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    The ball was crossed in from 2-3 yards away and hit the blokes arm. According to the rule book it has to be intentional.
    Incorrect according to the rule book if one team gains a advantage weather intentional or accedental it's deemed handball
    Quote Originally Posted by #fixsmithpark View Post
    I'M GULLIBLE!

  11. #1151
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    17,380
    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate soldier View Post
    lets agree that refs are just people that arent talented enough to play the game....
    or are just there to spectate the game from the middle of the park whilst getting paid.

  12. #1152
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,875
    Quote Originally Posted by Premy View Post
    Incorrect according to the rule book if one team gains a advantage weather intentional or accedental it's deemed handball
    I don't think the law chart states that... I think that's a common reasoning behind giving a free kick for handball though.

    The free kick should be given if it was intentional. But the intentional part covers a lot of things, e.g where their hands are, if they are intentionally away from the body in an unnatural position and they touch the ball, it's a free kick whether the ball hit the hand or not, the hands are in an unnatural position.
    However, if the player had his/her hands by their side, the ball strikes the arm and falls to their feet.....play on. Even though they have gained an advantage with the ball striking their arm and the ball falling to their feet, their hands were not in an unnatural position, the ball hit the arm, the arm did not reach for the ball.

    Essentially it's all about interpretation by each individual referee.

  13. #1153
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    439
    Quote Originally Posted by Bremsstrahlung View Post
    I don't think the law chart states that... I think that's a common reasoning behind giving a free kick for handball though.

    The free kick should be given if it was intentional. But the intentional part covers a lot of things, e.g where their hands are, if they are intentionally away from the body in an unnatural position and they touch the ball, it's a free kick whether the ball hit the hand or not, the hands are in an unnatural position.
    However, if the player had his/her hands by their side, the ball strikes the arm and falls to their feet.....play on. Even though they have gained an advantage with the ball striking their arm and the ball falling to their feet, their hands were not in an unnatural position, the ball hit the arm, the arm did not reach for the ball.

    Essentially it's all about interpretation by each individual referee.
    At LAST-the voice of reason

  14. #1154
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    RULE 12 from FIFA Rules

    Handling the ball
    Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with
    the ball with his hand or arm. The referee must take the following into
    consideration:
    the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)
    • the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)
    • the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an
    infringement
    • touching the ball with an object held in the hand (clothing, shinguard, etc.)
    counts as an infringement
    • hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard, etc.) counts as an
    infringement

    Disciplinary sanctions
    There are circumstances when a caution for unsporting behaviour is required
    when a player deliberately handles the ball, e.g. when a player:
    • deliberately handles the ball to prevent an opponent gaining possession
    • attempts to score a goal by deliberately handling the ball
    A player is sent off, however, if he prevents a goal or an obvious goalscoring
    opportunity by deliberately handling the ball. This punishment arises not from
    the act of the player deliberately handling the ball but from the unacceptable
    and unfair intervention that prevented a goal being scored.
    Restart of play
    • Direct free kick from the position where the offence occurred (see Law 13 –
    Position of free kick) or penalty kick
    Outside his own penalty area, the goalkeeper has the same restrictions
    on handling the ball as any other player. Inside his own penalty area, the
    goalkeeper cannot be guilty of a handling offence incurring a direct free kick
    or any misconduct related to handling the ball. He can, however, be guilty of
    several handling offences that incur an indirect free kick.
    There are the Rules of the game in relation to Handball for all the budding referees out there and the other idiots wo think they know what they are talking about but really have NFI.

    As the Jets Yoof player never made any deliberate action to MOVE his arm/hand towards the flight of the the ball (as Matt McKay (****) did V Japan the other night) then there can be no penalty.



    Refs have a hard enough job as it is with their guide dogs barking and not tripping over their walking canes whilst strolling around the pitch with dark sunglasses on. They don't need you sticking up for them when they are clearly in the wrong to hide their blatant incompetence in not knowing a simple rule

  15. #1155
    aka WLG pv4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,462
    if his hand was in an outrageous/unnatural position, i can understand it being a PK. however the big rule i'd be questioning in this context (and note i wasn't there, so didn't get to see it) is the second point in mfkfc's rulebook - the one about the distance between the players, and the unexpectedness of it all. if they were really close and the dude just kicked/crossed the ball, and before there was any time to even react to it it had hit the hand, then i'd say that's not intentional and hence not a PK. what say you, outsider?

    btw in regards to this rule:

    Handling the ball
    Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with
    the ball with his hand or arm. The referee must take the following into
    consideration:
    • hitting the ball with a thrown object (boot, shinguard, etc.) counts as an
    infringement
    does that mean the liverpool supporter v sunderland a few years back should have been pulled up for handball when he threw the beachball onto the field?

  16. #1156
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by militiamon View Post
    This is beautiful and deserves to be quoted again.
    Thought you would be impressed.


    Gee did I have a great weekend.

    Got to watch the great man in action and he didn't disappoint bagging 5.

    Played golf on Sunday and holed out from the fairway 140 metres out (didn't see it though as flag was out of view but did get the pleasure to find my ball in the bottom of the hole) and posted my best ever score of 75 off the stick 4 over when usually I go around in 85-90 shots.

    Living the dream at the moment

  17. #1157
    aka WLG pv4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,462
    in regards to valentine running out of food extremely early, and not serving any alcohol at all etc - do they get punished for that by the federation? am i right in saying that all venues MUST serve alcohol as they charge admission to get in and all that jazz? is there a book on NBN regulations in regards to what is expected of clubs on gameday?

  18. #1158
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by pv4 View Post
    does that mean the liverpool supporter v sunderland a few years back should have been pulled up for handball when he threw the beachball onto the field?
    If I remember right the Sunderland shot hit the beach ball and deflected??

    Rather than the beach ball was thrown by a Scouse player at the ball shot at goal by Sunderland player????

  19. #1159
    aka WLG pv4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,462
    Quote Originally Posted by MFKS View Post
    If I remember right the Sunderland shot hit the beach ball and deflected??

    Rather than the beach ball was thrown by a Scouse player at the ball shot at goal by Sunderland player????
    a liverpool supporter threw it on the field & sunderland eventually shot, which it deflected off. i did say the liverpool supporter should have been pulled up

  20. #1160
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    KOTARA STH
    Posts
    15,590
    Quote Originally Posted by pv4 View Post
    in regards to valentine running out of food extremely early, and not serving any alcohol at all etc - do they get punished for that by the federation? am i right in saying that all venues MUST serve alcohol as they charge admission to get in and all that jazz? is there a book on NBN regulations in regards to what is expected of clubs on gameday?
    Alcohol would only be allowed to be served with the relevant Liquor Licence. Applying for one isn't ****ing hard and there is no reason why they couldn't get one as they are held by other clubs at other council owned facilities.

    One reason they may not have one would be due to action by Police/Courts taken for breaches of the licence ie selling to kids/intoxicated persons etc in the past but someone would have heard about that if that had transpired

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •