So if HSG own the lease, the Jets would, theoretically, have priority. No?
This would be my fear too. However you hope that a new owner sees the benefit in keeping lower priced memberships to retain a high number of paying customers. This would be influenced by the lease they would get on the stadium, I guess. If they are getting a cut of food and beverage sales, etc, then they are more likely to keep the prices low.
Back to having no shirt sponsor again. We aren't going to be appealing because of our lack of success in recent years. Actually, since the Tinkler take-over we haven't made the finals...right?
Yep. As I said earlier they have a product to protect. If the best outcoe for the product is relocation then that's how it goes. I'd still think this region has a very very strong case.
Possibly so. No better way for Tinkler to say "I love you guys after all" and appeasing us by doing such a move while increasing merchandise sales as well.






Reply With Quote