I will guarantee that Adelaide are more incensed at the VAR call than they would have been had it been just a ref error with no VAR.
It heightens emotions...
I will guarantee that Adelaide are more incensed at the VAR call than they would have been had it been just a ref error with no VAR.
It heightens emotions...
If y’all wanna see where this shit will end up go check out the Patriots/Steelers NFL game today.
Those mother****ers can’t even explain what a catch is.
Burn it all down
hashtagplaguehadthesteelersmoneylinegoddamnit
that was pretty amazing. if that wasn't a catch, then nothing is.Originally Posted by plague
I feel like we’re mostly agreeing. With the back play clear red cards though, I think if Bobo commits a foul against Melb City, City should at least have the benefit of him being off the field, rather than waiting for the MRP.
But yeah, limit it’s use to B & W incidents, don’t use it for on the ball incidents outside either box, and try to keep it in the background as much as possible.
And this is the most ignorant post ever if you think VAR will ever eradicate bad refereeing decisions from the game. I think I and a lot of football fans (being the most played and watched sport in the world for a century) can live with the odd bad call.
In before "I don't want perfect, I just want better"/"It just needs to be improved".
On another note Bobo ain't getting suspended as the VAR looked at it the time
Griff sack whack thing all over
Ironic Berisha got done because the VAR didn't look at it
Thats the whole issue.
We havent got anyone/ref who can interpret and implement the system at any consistent level. So we have to dumb it down to offsides, handballs, ball over line stuff. maybe some back play off the ball grub stuff could be added.
Last edited by hawk; 18-12-2017 at 07:56 PM.
jesus. just watched the a-league hour on fox. first time i've seen the red cards in the gypo derby. ridiculous that they were overturned for reds. i would have had no problem if the ref had given them straight red at the time, but i just don't see them as worthy of changing after watching a replay.
they also had delovski on the panel for a bit. apparently the VAR is being brought in to provide "consistency". **** me, we are going to end a lot of games with 2 players on each side. unsurprisingly, there was absolutely no discussion about the bobo challenge on muscat.
some of the interview is on the foxsports page: https://www.foxsports.com.au/football/a-league
I still think a lot of people missed the point last night.
Strebre wasn’t there to explain VAR, because Strebre IS the VAR.
People think it’s some geenyus computer system that takes out human error.
Nope, it’s just another human prone to the same errors as the bloke in the middle.
I don’t need more Strebres thanks.
Is the Bobo incident under review or has Alex Brosque determined Bobo has no case to answer to ?
Nah, blue aids are exempt from reds and yellows
You realise there's a difference between a human making a split second decision from possibly an obstructed or not-so-great viewpoint... and a human making a decision after watching several replays from several angles? I'm not saying it's perfect, but surely you can see which one has the potential for a higher number of correct calls?
Yet despite the replays they are getting shit wrong
That penalty we got on Saturday
FFS who the **** they think they kidding that this is handball??
FMD I will take it
But not in a million years was that the correct call
The difference between VAR and video ref is its not supposed to make correct calls. Its supposed to remove obvious errors. Consider it being the same as the hawkeye in the cricket where it says the ball is demolishing leg stump but only 49% of it is hitting the stumps so the umpire's call that it was going down leg will stand. Same deal.
Ref in our game made the split second call that it was a handball. Upon viewing replays we all go "Jeez that's a harsh call". But was it an obvious error? That's where the VAR comes unstuck, they obviously decided it was not an "obvious" error (aka its understandable that the ref thought it was a handball) so it was not overturned.
As I alluded above - think for a minute, if there was no VAR what would have happened? We would have been given a dodgy penalty. Adelaide would have been pissed off but it would have been a story for 24-48 hours. Bozza would have whinged and we move on.You realise there's a difference between a human making a split second decision from possibly an obstructed or not-so-great viewpoint... and a human making a decision after watching several replays from several angles? I'm not saying it's perfect, but surely you can see which one has the potential for a higher number of correct calls?
With the VAR we got the same decision, but we also got highly charged emotions resulting in a coach being sent, players losing it, Ernie looking embarrassed and it is still being talked about. This is not just about getting the decision right - it is about the impact it is having on the spectacle, the game itself and the emotions of all involved including the fans. Poor calls are a part of the game - get over it.
Just listened to Fox podcast - Simon Hill was ready to unleash for the full pod on VAR but they put a time limit on it. He's right in that there are plenty of other things in the league that need money above a techno trial. Loved the talk on goal line technology used in the EPL.
Peacock - "can't get it because it's ridiculously expensive".
Hill - "well get someone to sponsor it - they found a sponsor for VAR quick enough!"
see this is where i have the issue. what is "obvious"? strebre was adamant that those two red card decisions were obviously incorrect calls, but who apart from him (and the ref he convinced on the field - i think strebre was the VAR that night) thought it was an obvious error to give them yellow cards?
similarly, wasn't it "obvious" that bobo not getting at least a yellow was an error? VAR obviously didn't think so, cause it wasn't looked at (perhaps the time between the foul and fox picking it up was too long anyway).
i don't mind that our penalty decision wasn't overturned (although i'd be spewing if it was a penalty against us). i didn't think it was "obvious" that it was an error. from memory, we still haven't seen a camera angle from the other side of the field.
if we are going to be "consistent", as strebre said was the motive behind introducing the technology, don't we have to review every single tackle to see if they have made contact with the legs in the same manner as the two mariners players? or check every tackle to see if anybody swings an elbow in the process? i'm not arguing about the merits or otherwise of any of the red cards, just about the fairness of the situation. mind you, when the opposition captain (thwaite) is yelling at the ref about how stupid a red card to the opposition is, i feel it's pretty obvious (that word again!) that an error has been made.
and there are two things i can see happening more. players going down and staying down (like the guy that muscat hit - he seemed to pop straight up once he knew the review was on), and players reacting more outrageously to any tackle that ends up with somebody on the ground (think isiais every time anybody comes within 25m of him). anything to slow the game down to allow the VAR to have a look at something.
If there’s no VAR I get pissed that Nabbout’s goal was ruled offside. You don’t think Adelaide fans and coaching staff wouldn’t have been pissed with that handball call anyway? I’ve walked out of there way too many times disgusted at the refereeing, when the refereeing shouldn’t even be an issue, not to the extent it has been. Last season there were so many calls that made you wonder whether they were bent.
And before you mention the errors with VAR, how long have we had it? 11 rounds? Compared to how many decades and decades of refs who still make huge blunders.
I don’t want games & seasons to be decided by big referee errors. Can I see refs ever improving? No. Can I see VAR being improved. Absolutely.
Kris Griffiths Jones said there was no other camera angle available for the Jets penalty.
It shouldn’t be used for anything outside the 18’s unless the linesmen or ref stops play because they thought they saw an off the ball incident, like they did pre-VAR. But instead of discussing what they thought they saw, they can look at the replay. Pretty much save it for things like elbows, stamps, that sort of thuggish shit that goes on behind play.
Using this weekend just finished as your evidence?
Nope.
In my opinion the ref got a bigger % of his calls correct than the VAR did.
and before we start, there is no way to categorically prove any of them except for 1 (Which the VAR got right).
Which is why I’m happy for that ‘one’ to be judged, and not the others.
I remember a certain game where Jimmy Holland handballed the ****er in the box
Season was decided on the refs decision
Vukoshit lost his mind.
Gypos lost the GF
Jets won the GF with history showing Griff scored the winning goal
Gypo peasents can burn about the injustice of it whilst I wallow in the joy for all eternity
Don't want refs deciding seasons ??
FFS they decided our finest ever moment.
I will be forever grateful to Mark Breeze being a blind ****
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote