well you're on the scoreboard now, congratulations
Thanks for walking into that one.
You just called an egg into the hair of a fully grown man "Violence"! Just think about that for a second. You think that getting egg in the hair is violence? Hahahahaha.
You also compared the egg incident with the mosque attack like they are somehow on the same scale? Please stop, take a breath and think about what was lost in that attack and then revise your comments.
Also, and this is the best part. For everyone commenting on this. That kid is 17... He isn't Left, Right or Centred. He doesn't have an opinion on politics. He doesn't even know how to vote. At 17 I didn't even know all the political parties. He probably just thought "that guys a wank, I'm gonna get famous for 15 seconds", but don't let logic get in the way of anger and stupidity.
it would have been interesting to see if some oil execs kid egged AOC for her stupidly stupid thoughts on the 'New Green Deal'.
i hate the thought of 'whataboutism', but its pretty clear the kid can be in the wrong AND a hero all at once.
Anning shouldnt be in Parliament with such a stupid voting system.
Anning shouldnt be saying that stupid shit he said.
Eggboy shouldnt be allowed to break eggs over the head of people he disagrees with.
Everyone 'supporting' Eggboy, did you think the student who confronted Chelsea Clinton at the NYC vigil was justified? Because the reaction to that has been real messy.
17 year old kid is a dickhead.
Anning justified to get one shot at him of equal value - but not a 2nd and certainly not one of greater force than the egg.
Annings Gestapo though should have the book thrown at them. Nothing to do with them. There was absolutely no threat to Anning when they jumped the kid.
Did I say how much of a dickhead the 17 year old kid was ? He's not the future and if he is then the zombie apocalypse can't get here soon enough.
I'm not surprised.Originally Posted by Frodo;221***
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-...ttack/10910708
Pauline Hanson abstaining from vote to censure Anning.
What a piss weak excuse for a human that piece of shit is.
actually an interesting sidenote to all this is that the pollies are all now pointing their venom at 'the social medias'.
Somehow implying that Facebook/twitter etc have a fair proportion of blame for letting it be livestreamed, and for distributing anti immigration materials.
id call it a bit of a reach, but jeez, thats an understatement.
she has to on principal. she is in a no win situation. she is either for free speech, or against it. she sprob the only honest one there that is 'trying' to maintain a position.
these gutless Pollies are standing behind an inneffective motion in order to express their 'outrage'.
no doubt then they'll all go out the front and light a candle for the victims and all will be tied up in a little bow.
instead of yanno, fixing the system that puts shitkhunts like Anning in Parliament in the first place.
so the play is to go after the assault angle on the kid.The Houses of Parliament cannot expel a politician for their behaviour, but they can be disqualified if they are convicted of offences punishable by imprisonment for a year or longer.
Morrison was the only one to even hint at it when he said he 'hopes the full force of the law comes down on him (Anning)'.
The rest are just posturing, then will be back in his office next week doing deals to get votes through Parliament.
Pollies dont care about any of this, they just want to be 'seen' to care.
Hansons morals are shit, but she seems to be one of the only ones in there with any code.
Exactly right. About the system being farked.
Bloke comes from a family that openly hunted and slaughtered aboriginal people, captured young aboriginal boys to use as slave labour - and unlike the rest of Australia seems to refer to it as the good old days.
Then you have a list of legal issues as well including bankruptcy proceedings ......
He's not fit to run a chook raffle.