I feel like I don't need to explain why I know Spuds are not so good. If needed I can write an extensive list, but at this point I don't think it's necessary.
All I know is since the end of last year your competitive results have been WDLDWDLLWL which is more losses than wins and the same amount of draws as wins. Or 3 wins in 10 competitive matches. I am sorry that I'm not sure which way you would rather it shown.
I know at the very least that, more than zilch.
For full disclosure and to save you the hassle of googling, I will format the Arsenal results in a similar nature for you to compare and make whatever judgements you are more than welcome to: WWLDDWWWD which is more wins than draws than losses, or 5 wins in 9 competitive matches.
As you will see above, these are just facts without judgement.
One thing I would like to point out as an observation though is it is interesting for someone so keen on referencing Woolwich as often as he can, I will have to trust your judgement in calling Sp*rs the new guy in town and respect this is fact from now.
On a personal level I took great delight in Serge Gnabry's "North London is Red" comment
OK
You get that on the big jobs.
Just to be clear here. I hate spuds more than any other team, but they definitely aren't the only trash team in the top 6 right now.
Spuds are the most overrated team out of the 6 and no matter what happens will always be loved by the pundits. Hence why other clubs fans lover seeing them lose, just to watch the English media somehow spin it into a positive for them. Pochettino has the exact amount of trophies as he deserves, he is a good coach. But he hasn't done anything spectacular.
United are still using the Fergie excuse almost a decade later rather than just admitting they are a very poorly run club. They spend money, it doesn't work, they change coaches, it doesn't work, they employ former players, it doesn't work. Woodward is the issue but as long as he is making money, they aren't getting rid of him.
Chelsea have about 35 fans across the globe and yet still act like they are a big club. Fortunately for us they don't have enough history to stay relevant when the trophies dried up, they'll be the new Everton in no time and Roman will sell them.
Arsenal are perfect and there's pretty much nothing that anyone can say bad about them.
Are you confusing spurs with Liverpool?
Couldn't agree more. The minute they appoint someone who knows what they are doing to run the club the will, unfortunately, start being a contender again.
Like it or lump it, they are the most successful London club in recent history.Chelsea have about 35 fans across the globe and yet still act like they are a big club. Fortunately for us they don't have enough history to stay relevant when the trophies dried up, they'll be the new Everton in no time and Roman will sell them.
tenor.jpgArsenal are perfect and there's pretty much nothing that anyone can say bad about them.
Wowsers, you managed to shoehorn your definition of 'recent history' right in that small space between United and Citeh.
That's some surgeon type precision right there.
Well played.
Dunster gonna come out soon and define his recent history as somewhere straight after fire got invented.