SFCTV said you can't give that if you don't give the one in the derby because that one was "more of a goal". So that must be a rule.
Bozza is doing my head in.
SFCTV said you can't give that if you don't give the one in the derby because that one was "more of a goal". So that must be a rule.
Bozza is doing my head in.
Get a camera on the goal line FFS. How hard is it?
VAR and Ref not doing Roar any favours.
Melb City very lucky not to be a goal down and missing Rostyn Griffiths who manages to avoid being booked for tackles that anyone else would get a yellow.
Finally. VAR gets it right. Penalty to Roar.
Beath + VAR = SHIT.
He must be on the payroll at City to give a penalty for what appears to be no foul from WSW.
Last edited by The Dunster; 23-11-2019 at 08:18 AM.
There was a WSW player near him so that's a clear penalty.
Maybe some relief on the way...
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/50944416
Just add a time limit and we can move on.
i'm sure it will make all the difference. one persons clear and obvious is another persons marginal
came here to post the BBC article - specifically the table at the bottom
agree with the time limit - give the VAR jerks 60 seconds, if they can't find anything conclusively wrong in that time the goal stands
we can get down to the millimetres and body mechanics at a time when AI is capable of determining this stuff in time frames that work with the play of the game
The Championship Chronicles - The Jetstream's review of the 2007/08 season. www.newcastlefootball.net/chronicles
That Burnley game. Just bin VAR now for God's sake
Deeply disappointed the A-League has ditched VAR for the remainder of the season. Why?