I quite like both of them. I think the away strip is even better than last season.
Like PV4, i will wait to make full judgement until i see them on, but first impression is a pass.
I understand what people say about the red patch but what other options are there?
Stripe shirts would be hard to design with a number on the back. If they went with blue background everyone would probably complain that there is too much blue.
WE DON'T DO WALKING AWAY !
Can someone with mad photo shop skills make the middle blue strip gold to see how it would look? Please.
Originally Posted by #fixsmithpark
Would make the kit too busy IMO
OK
look ok to me.
seeing them in person will be the real test.
Mad skills?I do all my work in paint, that's how mad my skills are.
Haha gold I would buy this in a heartbeat.Mad skills?
Can't say I'm a fan of the home, the back looks awful. The away is a pass.
But saying that you really need to wait to see what it looks like in the flesh.
Agree with the whole releasing kits as photoshop images, a bit amateur hour, compare that reveal to the city reveal...
I do like the nice touch of using the gold in the blk logo, would be interested to see what the sponsor logo looked like in gold too.
I think if you get rid of the horrible BLK on the shoulder, it would look decent.
I (and I'm pretty sure you) have been saying this since the first Hunter Ports logo!! Too true my man.
OK
At least they have a solid neutral colour unlike the victory ended up with.
Ironically have a look at the standard CQP logo.....
Mad skills?
Got to agree, makes it look way to busy. Starting to look more like a rugby league shirt with that much going on
WE DON'T DO WALKING AWAY !
the home strip looks like they are in a cage. Seems they are ainming for the active suport look.
I like the away kit.
ui would jizz my pants if we ever went for a harlequine red/blue option.
CQP owned in part by Tinkler apparently.
Too busy, indeed.
Why the **** do companies struggle with vertical stripes? It's not like gold numbers with a white outline bends in too much with red and blue, FFS.
Dodgy copy/pasting aside, what exactly is wrong with this?
Sort it out, BLK. Won't be buying one and all I can say is Bad Luck, Kuntz.
Last edited by Grimario; 15-07-2014 at 02:55 PM. Reason: Took out the gold stripe front bit
back looks a lot better.
Too busy, indeed. Ignoring the front gold stripe (because, for some reason, I decided to edit the already edited pic instead of the original)... why the **** do companies struggle with vertical stripes? It's not like gold numbers with a white outline bends in too much with red and blue, FFS.
Dodgy copy/pasting aside, what exactly is wrong with this?
Sort it out, BLK. Won't be buying one and all I can say is Bad Luck, Kuntz.
back looks so much better.
Provided the number has a bold font there is no reason to need a stupid large block out panel. A bit of care with the size and positioning of the stripes is all that is needed too.
That back does look better than the real one...
WE DON'T DO WALKING AWAY !
Yeah, even then I can't really see any combination of the red and blue on the back that would make gold with white outline hard to read.
shouldve just given the jersey design to you guys, 5mins & some common sense, win
EXCUSE THE SHOTTY PAINT JOB
Taken Grim's back idea.
Made CQP gold on home jersey.
Moved cinnamon&white stripe to the side.
IMO this is what we should have:
OK
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
