Quote Originally Posted by Jetmaster View Post
The previous face knock, the match situation, reference from Thomas, apologies, lack of injury.....none of that appears to have made any difference.
The weird summary by the chairman doesnt make it sound any better. They were in for him no matter what but the inconsistency in these judgements is what irks most.
Appeal and get it down to 6.
In for him??

That it went to a panel and he didnt get a set suspension a day or two after the game says they were in for him

That they couldnt make decision on the day of the hearing and needed 48 hours to come up with it says they were in for him