No, my offer to answer serious questions was a genuine one. I said I would answer them in the Religion thread. I've certainly got no interest in talking to someone who feels its okay to insult me before we get started on more serious topics. I personally don't know why MFKS does it when he's got Mathew 7:6 to guide him.Originally Posted by furns
Updated thread title to warn sensible people to just sit back and watch the fun
That's something you might like to consider about God. If science can't even predict how I am going to act and what I am going to say, how do you think you would even be able to test how God chooses to interact with His creation. There is no problem with science at all, all methods of truth discovery are not contradictory whether science, philosophy, history, theology and subjective human experience. Most apparent contradictions are able to be resolved by looking at things in their context. There is so much data out there but people choose to blinker themselves because most of it is subjective. There is even testable evidence but it is rejected because it can't be reproduced, as if you could reproduce what God has done. There is historical evidence but people just pick and choose which history is real based on their beliefs. But if you rely on only one method as the only way to find truth, with its inherent limitations, you aren't going to get the full picture. Boz says that scientists use "philosophical discussion" to look at the scientific method, which is a good start.
Reply With Quote