Quote Originally Posted by joel31 View Post
Considering you said that you are open to new evidence don't you think you are bit close-minded by making this statement. You may see an Abrahamic god impossible but how can you say when you haven't seen the whole universe or what's outside of it (if there is an outside of it) and you aren't some kind of all-knowing being that there is conclusively no intelligent designer or creator
lol. didn't i already cover this with you?

i should have said that our current understanding of the universe is wholly inconsistent with the hypothesis of an abrahamic god, rendering the probability of it's existence vanishingly small. but that's not so catchy. aren't i allowed just a little arristic.licence?

so, to recap from the past dozen or whatever pages. the bible - the only "evidence of yahweh - is horribly unreliable and of dubious authorship. either the authors transcribed
it wrong, yahweh's a mischievous conniving so-and-so, or it's all bullshit.

in lieu of any evidence, and in the presence of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, we reject the gos hypothesis.

and why would you care if there was a non-abrahamic god? as far as He/She/It's concerned, you're as bad as me

and if there's a deistic god, well, by definition it doesn't interfere with the universe, so who cares?