Quote Originally Posted by The Dunster View Post
Foster helped a man that had overwhelming evidence to prove his innocence [ Playing a football game while said crime was to have taken place].
Foster didnt have anywhere near 'overwhelming evidence'. He had one side of the argument. ok, thats fine, but countries have judicial processes to go through dont they? Is it Australias bizness to decide who is or isnt guilty of a crime in another country.

Member is correct in that we sure seem to pick and choose our targets. Assange was the darling of the hippies when he outed the warmongers, but the second he unloaded on their girl Hillary, he became a leper. Its almost as if they loved the truth coming out......just not 'all' the truth.

Assange ended up with no mates, despite at one time getting cheered on by everyone.