Quote Originally Posted by hawk View Post
Lee's can take 50% offault as well.

If he didnt skitz out and sack Miller for no reason we would have been a little better off in the short term and lot better in the long term.
And this, people, is the truth bomb. Regardless of what led up to the decision, if Miller hadn't been sacked we would have had some stability for the first time in ages.

I had a thought about the number of people stating they won't be back next season and why there is a fondness for Miller, even now. Even though his man management at times was apparently indifferent and he had an ego, Scott Miller marked a move away from the same-old people involved in the club for the last 7 years that have been unsuccessful - like Deans, Zane, Jones. He brought an expectation of European professionalism to the team, a youthful energy and fresh ideas. He was someone external to the club who was coming in without pre-conceived ideas or perceptions.

The move back to Jones and Zane, perhaps for some, marked the return to the old ways of the club. People are just fed up with the medocrity. Last season marked progress both on and off the field - sponsors, an improved table position and some good wins late in the year. That's all that we can say about Miller's time.

Maybe in the end it would have all turned to shit as it has this season, but we will never know.